Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Press/Media
Datasets
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Erie's four functions: Reframing choice of law in federal courts
Allan Erbsen
Academics (Law)
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Review article
›
peer-review
8
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Erie's four functions: Reframing choice of law in federal courts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Authoritative Source
9%
Choice of Law
100%
Common Law
18%
Constitutional Order
9%
Customary International Law
9%
Default Rules
9%
Division of Powers
9%
Dread
9%
Enlightenment
9%
Erie
100%
Erie Doctrine
36%
Federal Common Law
18%
Federal Courts
100%
Federal Law
45%
Federal System
9%
General Law
9%
Hanna
9%
Haze
9%
High Court
9%
Jumbling
9%
Jurisprudence
18%
Lawyers
9%
Morass
9%
Reconceptualize
9%
Recurring
9%
Rule of Law
9%
Sources of Law
9%
State Institutions
9%
State Law
18%
Statutory Law
9%
Successive Generations
9%
Supremacy Clause
9%
Social Sciences
Courts
100%
Emotions
11%
Federal Law
55%
International Law
11%
Law
100%
Precedent
11%
Rule of Law
22%
Source of Law
11%
State Law
22%