Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Environmental Factors and School Lunch Participation Among Minnesota Secondary Students in the US

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: This cross-sectional study explored factors associated with school lunch participation with universal free meals. Methods: Fifty-nine foodservice authorities representing 103 Minnesota secondary schools provided survey data assessing lunch participation and school factors, including location, school enrollment, school type, free/reduced eligibility, open campus policies, eating time, lunch start times, foodservice production type, and Smarter Lunchrooms techniques. Generalized estimating equation regression assessed the relation between these factors and lunch participation. Results: Mean lunch participation rates were 53% for high schools, 63% for middle schools, and 65% for Jr/Sr high schools. Compared with conventional foodservice production systems, nonconventional systems were associated with a 16 percentage point lower participation (P < 0.01). No other factors were statistically associated with lunch participation. Conclusions and Implications: Foodservice production systems may be a key overlooked factor related to meal participation. Larger-scale research is needed to clarify the impact foodservice production systems have on meal participation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)370-378
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Nutrition Education and Behavior
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Authors

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • child health
  • nutrition policy
  • schools

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental Factors and School Lunch Participation Among Minnesota Secondary Students in the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this