Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance: The role of critical components in the process of resistance

Michael Pfau, Kyle James Tusing, Ascan F. Koerner, Waipeng Lee, Linda C. Godbold, Linda J. Penaloza, Violet Shu Huei Yang, Yah Huei Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 44 Citations

Abstract

This investigation tested the effectiveness of inoculation treatments on 790 participants. The study probed the relationship between threat and involvement, their role in inoculation, and the nature of cognitive processes triggered via inoculation. The pattern of results suggests that inoculation elicits threat, threat contributes to resistance, and resistance is most pronounced for more involved receivers and on behalf of more involving topics. Finally, the results shed additional light on the process of inoculation but revealed a process considerably more intricate than was initially predicted. Structural equation analyses indicated that inoculation and involvement exert parallel, but independent, effects throughout the process of resistance. Both contributed directly to resistance, and both indirectly furthered resistance, but along unique paths. Whereas inoculation elicited receiver threat, which indirectly enhanced resistance through its sizable and immediate impact on Phase 2 attitudes, involvement contributed to the process of counterarguing and, thus, exerted a delayed indirect impact on Phase 3 attitudes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-215
Number of pages29
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume24
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

resistance
process
threat
involvement
recipient
attitude
impact
construct
effectiveness
investigation
participant
effect

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance : The role of critical components in the process of resistance. / Pfau, Michael; Tusing, Kyle James; Koerner, Ascan F.; Lee, Waipeng; Godbold, Linda C.; Penaloza, Linda J.; Yang, Violet Shu Huei; Hong, Yah Huei.

In: Human Communication Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1997, p. 187-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pfau, Michael; Tusing, Kyle James; Koerner, Ascan F.; Lee, Waipeng; Godbold, Linda C.; Penaloza, Linda J.; Yang, Violet Shu Huei; Hong, Yah Huei / Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance : The role of critical components in the process of resistance.

In: Human Communication Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, 1997, p. 187-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9a4954ceca0c4415b9e7baba3dd04362,
title = "Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance: The role of critical components in the process of resistance",
abstract = "This investigation tested the effectiveness of inoculation treatments on 790 participants. The study probed the relationship between threat and involvement, their role in inoculation, and the nature of cognitive processes triggered via inoculation. The pattern of results suggests that inoculation elicits threat, threat contributes to resistance, and resistance is most pronounced for more involved receivers and on behalf of more involving topics. Finally, the results shed additional light on the process of inoculation but revealed a process considerably more intricate than was initially predicted. Structural equation analyses indicated that inoculation and involvement exert parallel, but independent, effects throughout the process of resistance. Both contributed directly to resistance, and both indirectly furthered resistance, but along unique paths. Whereas inoculation elicited receiver threat, which indirectly enhanced resistance through its sizable and immediate impact on Phase 2 attitudes, involvement contributed to the process of counterarguing and, thus, exerted a delayed indirect impact on Phase 3 attitudes.",
author = "Michael Pfau and Tusing, {Kyle James} and Koerner, {Ascan F.} and Waipeng Lee and Godbold, {Linda C.} and Penaloza, {Linda J.} and Yang, {Violet Shu Huei} and Hong, {Yah Huei}",
year = "1997",
volume = "24",
pages = "187--215",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance

T2 - Human Communication Research

AU - Pfau,Michael

AU - Tusing,Kyle James

AU - Koerner,Ascan F.

AU - Lee,Waipeng

AU - Godbold,Linda C.

AU - Penaloza,Linda J.

AU - Yang,Violet Shu Huei

AU - Hong,Yah Huei

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - This investigation tested the effectiveness of inoculation treatments on 790 participants. The study probed the relationship between threat and involvement, their role in inoculation, and the nature of cognitive processes triggered via inoculation. The pattern of results suggests that inoculation elicits threat, threat contributes to resistance, and resistance is most pronounced for more involved receivers and on behalf of more involving topics. Finally, the results shed additional light on the process of inoculation but revealed a process considerably more intricate than was initially predicted. Structural equation analyses indicated that inoculation and involvement exert parallel, but independent, effects throughout the process of resistance. Both contributed directly to resistance, and both indirectly furthered resistance, but along unique paths. Whereas inoculation elicited receiver threat, which indirectly enhanced resistance through its sizable and immediate impact on Phase 2 attitudes, involvement contributed to the process of counterarguing and, thus, exerted a delayed indirect impact on Phase 3 attitudes.

AB - This investigation tested the effectiveness of inoculation treatments on 790 participants. The study probed the relationship between threat and involvement, their role in inoculation, and the nature of cognitive processes triggered via inoculation. The pattern of results suggests that inoculation elicits threat, threat contributes to resistance, and resistance is most pronounced for more involved receivers and on behalf of more involving topics. Finally, the results shed additional light on the process of inoculation but revealed a process considerably more intricate than was initially predicted. Structural equation analyses indicated that inoculation and involvement exert parallel, but independent, effects throughout the process of resistance. Both contributed directly to resistance, and both indirectly furthered resistance, but along unique paths. Whereas inoculation elicited receiver threat, which indirectly enhanced resistance through its sizable and immediate impact on Phase 2 attitudes, involvement contributed to the process of counterarguing and, thus, exerted a delayed indirect impact on Phase 3 attitudes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031504353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031504353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 187

EP - 215

JO - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 2

ER -