TY - JOUR
T1 - Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes
T2 - A Single Institution's Early Learning Curve
AU - Groth, Shawn S.
AU - Whitson, Bryan A.
AU - D'Cunha, Jonathan
AU - Maddaus, Michael A
AU - Alsharif, Mariam
AU - Andrade, Rafael S
PY - 2008/10
Y1 - 2008/10
N2 - Background: The gold standard for mediastinal lymph node evaluation is mediastinoscopy, which is invasive and allows access to only a limited number of mediastinal lymph node (MLN) stations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 7). Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) is emerging as a useful, less invasive technique that offers access to a wider range of MLN stations (2, 3, 4, 7, 10, and 11). We report our initial experience with this procedure. Methods: Using our prospectively maintained database, we performed a single-institution retrospective chart review. Our study group consisted of all patients at the University of Minnesota who underwent EBUS-FNA for evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy or for thoracic malignancy staging from September 1, 2006, through December 15, 2007. To assess our learning curve, we plotted the cumulative sensitivity (%) and accuracy (%) of our EBUS-FNA results as a function of the number of procedures we performed. Results: During the study period, 100 patients underwent EBUS, 92 with FNA. Of these, 56 patients (34 women, 22 men; mean age, 60.4 ± 13.7 years) met our inclusion criteria. We found no complications. After our first 10 procedures, the sensitivity of our EBUS-FNA results was 96.2%; accuracy was 97.8% (rates comparable with other large series in the literature). Conclusions: We conclude that the learning curve for EBUS-FNA for thoracic surgeons is about 10 procedures.
AB - Background: The gold standard for mediastinal lymph node evaluation is mediastinoscopy, which is invasive and allows access to only a limited number of mediastinal lymph node (MLN) stations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 7). Endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) is emerging as a useful, less invasive technique that offers access to a wider range of MLN stations (2, 3, 4, 7, 10, and 11). We report our initial experience with this procedure. Methods: Using our prospectively maintained database, we performed a single-institution retrospective chart review. Our study group consisted of all patients at the University of Minnesota who underwent EBUS-FNA for evaluation of mediastinal lymphadenopathy or for thoracic malignancy staging from September 1, 2006, through December 15, 2007. To assess our learning curve, we plotted the cumulative sensitivity (%) and accuracy (%) of our EBUS-FNA results as a function of the number of procedures we performed. Results: During the study period, 100 patients underwent EBUS, 92 with FNA. Of these, 56 patients (34 women, 22 men; mean age, 60.4 ± 13.7 years) met our inclusion criteria. We found no complications. After our first 10 procedures, the sensitivity of our EBUS-FNA results was 96.2%; accuracy was 97.8% (rates comparable with other large series in the literature). Conclusions: We conclude that the learning curve for EBUS-FNA for thoracic surgeons is about 10 procedures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=52049112330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=52049112330&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.042
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.042
M3 - Article
C2 - 18805141
AN - SCOPUS:52049112330
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 86
SP - 1104
EP - 1110
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 4
ER -