TY - JOUR
T1 - Encapsulation technology for decentralized brewery wastewater treatment
T2 - A small pilot experiment
AU - Chen, Siming
AU - Arnold, William
AU - Wright, Natasha
AU - Zhu, Kuang
AU - Ajayi, Olutooni
AU - Novak, Paige
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - The feasibility of implementing encapsulation technology for the biological anaerobic treatment of high-strength wastewater was investigated. The small pilot-scale wastewater treatment process, deployed at a local brewery, consisted of a 4-L fermenting first-stage reactor containing alginate-encapsulated fermenting microorganisms and a 30-L methanogenic second-stage reactor containing alginate-encapsulated anaerobic digester sludge (CH4E reactor). A parallel second-stage 30-L anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) was operated for comparison. The first-stage reactor produced 40.4 ± 47.3% more volatile fatty acids than present in the influent wastewater. The CH4E reactor stared rapidly, with an off-gas methane content >60% after 14 days. It took >1 month for the AnMBR to achieve this performance. Nevertheless, the CH4E reactor performance declined relative to the AnMBR over time. This was thought to be a result of encapsulant leakage and the encapsulation of a non-ideal initial community. Further optimization is needed, but encapsulation shows promise for small-footprint anaerobic biological treatment applications.
AB - The feasibility of implementing encapsulation technology for the biological anaerobic treatment of high-strength wastewater was investigated. The small pilot-scale wastewater treatment process, deployed at a local brewery, consisted of a 4-L fermenting first-stage reactor containing alginate-encapsulated fermenting microorganisms and a 30-L methanogenic second-stage reactor containing alginate-encapsulated anaerobic digester sludge (CH4E reactor). A parallel second-stage 30-L anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) was operated for comparison. The first-stage reactor produced 40.4 ± 47.3% more volatile fatty acids than present in the influent wastewater. The CH4E reactor stared rapidly, with an off-gas methane content >60% after 14 days. It took >1 month for the AnMBR to achieve this performance. Nevertheless, the CH4E reactor performance declined relative to the AnMBR over time. This was thought to be a result of encapsulant leakage and the encapsulation of a non-ideal initial community. Further optimization is needed, but encapsulation shows promise for small-footprint anaerobic biological treatment applications.
KW - Anaerobic digestion
KW - Anaerobic membrane bioreactor
KW - Brewery wastewater
KW - Decentralized wastewater treatment
KW - Encapsulation technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120487769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120487769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126435
DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126435
M3 - Article
C2 - 34843871
AN - SCOPUS:85120487769
SN - 0960-8524
VL - 347
JO - Bioresource Technology
JF - Bioresource Technology
M1 - 126435
ER -