Employment Goals and Settings

Effects of Individual and Systemic Factors

Derek Nord, Kristin Hamre, Sandra Pettingell, Louise Magiera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) continue to experience high rates of unemployment. Previous research suggests that including an employment goal in an individual’s service plan can be a mechanism toward attaining employment, especially in a community setting. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of employment goals and employment in community and facility-based settings for people with IDD. This study used 2012 to 2013 National Core Indicators (NCI) Adult Consumer Survey data from 26 states to understand (a) the effect of disability and guardianship on attaining an employment goal and (b) the effect of disability, guardianship, and an employment goal on employment in community and facility-based settings. Results indicate that people with more significant intellectual disability (ID), communication and mobility challenges, and people under guardianship had significantly lower odds of an employment goal. Related to employment settings, people with an employment goal have significantly higher odds of employment in individual-community, odds ratio (OR) = 11.25, p ⩽.001, and group-community (OR = 6.07, p ⩽.001) settings. Those with more significant levels of ID had significantly lower odds of employment in individual-community (OR = 0.64, p ⩽.001), group-community (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.05), and facility-based settings (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.01). The odds of employment for people with communication and mobility challenges were significantly lower, across all settings. Guardianship status did not have a significant effect. These findings have policy and practice implications that should be considered in systems improvement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-206
Number of pages13
JournalResearch and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Intellectual Disability
Odds Ratio
Developmental Disabilities
Disabled Persons
Communication
Unemployment
Research

Keywords

  • employment
  • employment goal
  • intellectual and developmental disabilities
  • National Core Indicators
  • setting

Cite this

Employment Goals and Settings : Effects of Individual and Systemic Factors. / Nord, Derek; Hamre, Kristin; Pettingell, Sandra; Magiera, Louise.

In: Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.09.2018, p. 194-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{143860e9516f40b6a48a4167be047bc5,
title = "Employment Goals and Settings: Effects of Individual and Systemic Factors",
abstract = "People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) continue to experience high rates of unemployment. Previous research suggests that including an employment goal in an individual’s service plan can be a mechanism toward attaining employment, especially in a community setting. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of employment goals and employment in community and facility-based settings for people with IDD. This study used 2012 to 2013 National Core Indicators (NCI) Adult Consumer Survey data from 26 states to understand (a) the effect of disability and guardianship on attaining an employment goal and (b) the effect of disability, guardianship, and an employment goal on employment in community and facility-based settings. Results indicate that people with more significant intellectual disability (ID), communication and mobility challenges, and people under guardianship had significantly lower odds of an employment goal. Related to employment settings, people with an employment goal have significantly higher odds of employment in individual-community, odds ratio (OR) = 11.25, p ⩽.001, and group-community (OR = 6.07, p ⩽.001) settings. Those with more significant levels of ID had significantly lower odds of employment in individual-community (OR = 0.64, p ⩽.001), group-community (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.05), and facility-based settings (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.01). The odds of employment for people with communication and mobility challenges were significantly lower, across all settings. Guardianship status did not have a significant effect. These findings have policy and practice implications that should be considered in systems improvement.",
keywords = "employment, employment goal, intellectual and developmental disabilities, National Core Indicators, setting",
author = "Derek Nord and Kristin Hamre and Sandra Pettingell and Louise Magiera",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1540796918785352",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "194--206",
journal = "Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities",
issn = "1540-7969",
publisher = "Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Employment Goals and Settings

T2 - Effects of Individual and Systemic Factors

AU - Nord, Derek

AU - Hamre, Kristin

AU - Pettingell, Sandra

AU - Magiera, Louise

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) continue to experience high rates of unemployment. Previous research suggests that including an employment goal in an individual’s service plan can be a mechanism toward attaining employment, especially in a community setting. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of employment goals and employment in community and facility-based settings for people with IDD. This study used 2012 to 2013 National Core Indicators (NCI) Adult Consumer Survey data from 26 states to understand (a) the effect of disability and guardianship on attaining an employment goal and (b) the effect of disability, guardianship, and an employment goal on employment in community and facility-based settings. Results indicate that people with more significant intellectual disability (ID), communication and mobility challenges, and people under guardianship had significantly lower odds of an employment goal. Related to employment settings, people with an employment goal have significantly higher odds of employment in individual-community, odds ratio (OR) = 11.25, p ⩽.001, and group-community (OR = 6.07, p ⩽.001) settings. Those with more significant levels of ID had significantly lower odds of employment in individual-community (OR = 0.64, p ⩽.001), group-community (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.05), and facility-based settings (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.01). The odds of employment for people with communication and mobility challenges were significantly lower, across all settings. Guardianship status did not have a significant effect. These findings have policy and practice implications that should be considered in systems improvement.

AB - People with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) continue to experience high rates of unemployment. Previous research suggests that including an employment goal in an individual’s service plan can be a mechanism toward attaining employment, especially in a community setting. This study contributes to the understanding of the role of employment goals and employment in community and facility-based settings for people with IDD. This study used 2012 to 2013 National Core Indicators (NCI) Adult Consumer Survey data from 26 states to understand (a) the effect of disability and guardianship on attaining an employment goal and (b) the effect of disability, guardianship, and an employment goal on employment in community and facility-based settings. Results indicate that people with more significant intellectual disability (ID), communication and mobility challenges, and people under guardianship had significantly lower odds of an employment goal. Related to employment settings, people with an employment goal have significantly higher odds of employment in individual-community, odds ratio (OR) = 11.25, p ⩽.001, and group-community (OR = 6.07, p ⩽.001) settings. Those with more significant levels of ID had significantly lower odds of employment in individual-community (OR = 0.64, p ⩽.001), group-community (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.05), and facility-based settings (OR = 0.85, p ⩽.01). The odds of employment for people with communication and mobility challenges were significantly lower, across all settings. Guardianship status did not have a significant effect. These findings have policy and practice implications that should be considered in systems improvement.

KW - employment

KW - employment goal

KW - intellectual and developmental disabilities

KW - National Core Indicators

KW - setting

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049925143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049925143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1540796918785352

DO - 10.1177/1540796918785352

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 194

EP - 206

JO - Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

JF - Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities

SN - 1540-7969

IS - 3

ER -