Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks

Matthew K. Burns

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Providing students an appropriate level of challenge, called the instructional level, is an important component of effective instruction. Research regarding the optimal ratio of known to unknown items for drill tasks has been inconsistent. The author of the current article conducted an empirical meta-analysis of research on drill ratios by using the following groupings: < 50% known, 50% to 69% known, 70% to 85% known, and 90% known. Fifty-five effect size coefficients were computed, after eliminating outlying data, from 13 articles, with the 3 least challenging ratios resulting in strong mean effects. The most challenging (< 50% known) ratio resulted in a small to moderate effect. A mean effect size of .82 computed for various student outcomes compared to .43 for student preferences. Much stronger effects were also noted for tasks involving acquisition of new skills compared to proficiency tasks. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)167-174
Number of pages8
JournalRemedial and Special Education
Volume25
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 1 2004

Fingerprint

Mandrillus
Students
Research
Meta-Analysis
student
grouping
instruction

Cite this

Empirical analysis of drill ratio research : Refining the instructional level for drill tasks. / Burns, Matthew K.

In: Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.05.2004, p. 167-174.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0c14843c1ff141e3b0304ec35b2e3362,
title = "Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks",
abstract = "Providing students an appropriate level of challenge, called the instructional level, is an important component of effective instruction. Research regarding the optimal ratio of known to unknown items for drill tasks has been inconsistent. The author of the current article conducted an empirical meta-analysis of research on drill ratios by using the following groupings: < 50{\%} known, 50{\%} to 69{\%} known, 70{\%} to 85{\%} known, and 90{\%} known. Fifty-five effect size coefficients were computed, after eliminating outlying data, from 13 articles, with the 3 least challenging ratios resulting in strong mean effects. The most challenging (< 50{\%} known) ratio resulted in a small to moderate effect. A mean effect size of .82 computed for various student outcomes compared to .43 for student preferences. Much stronger effects were also noted for tasks involving acquisition of new skills compared to proficiency tasks. Implications for research and practice are discussed.",
author = "Burns, {Matthew K.}",
year = "2004",
month = "5",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "167--174",
journal = "Remedial and Special Education",
issn = "0741-9325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical analysis of drill ratio research

T2 - Refining the instructional level for drill tasks

AU - Burns, Matthew K.

PY - 2004/5/1

Y1 - 2004/5/1

N2 - Providing students an appropriate level of challenge, called the instructional level, is an important component of effective instruction. Research regarding the optimal ratio of known to unknown items for drill tasks has been inconsistent. The author of the current article conducted an empirical meta-analysis of research on drill ratios by using the following groupings: < 50% known, 50% to 69% known, 70% to 85% known, and 90% known. Fifty-five effect size coefficients were computed, after eliminating outlying data, from 13 articles, with the 3 least challenging ratios resulting in strong mean effects. The most challenging (< 50% known) ratio resulted in a small to moderate effect. A mean effect size of .82 computed for various student outcomes compared to .43 for student preferences. Much stronger effects were also noted for tasks involving acquisition of new skills compared to proficiency tasks. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

AB - Providing students an appropriate level of challenge, called the instructional level, is an important component of effective instruction. Research regarding the optimal ratio of known to unknown items for drill tasks has been inconsistent. The author of the current article conducted an empirical meta-analysis of research on drill ratios by using the following groupings: < 50% known, 50% to 69% known, 70% to 85% known, and 90% known. Fifty-five effect size coefficients were computed, after eliminating outlying data, from 13 articles, with the 3 least challenging ratios resulting in strong mean effects. The most challenging (< 50% known) ratio resulted in a small to moderate effect. A mean effect size of .82 computed for various student outcomes compared to .43 for student preferences. Much stronger effects were also noted for tasks involving acquisition of new skills compared to proficiency tasks. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2942538562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2942538562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:2942538562

VL - 25

SP - 167

EP - 174

JO - Remedial and Special Education

JF - Remedial and Special Education

SN - 0741-9325

IS - 3

ER -