Emergency management of severe sepsis and septic shock

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Numerous implementation studies have demonstrated the benefit of bundled care in the initial treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, but the relative value of each component of these bundles remains uncertain. Recent studies have attempted to further define the optimal supportive and adjunctive treatments for these patients. RECENT FINDINGS: The choice of optimal intravenous resuscitation fluid for the emergency treatment of severe sepsis remains uncertain. Albumin appears safe, although safety concerns have arisen regarding the use of hydroxyethyl starch. Norepinephrine and vasopressin appear superior to dopamine as vasopressors of choice. Several studies have successfully incorporated lactate clearance into resuscitation strategies, albeit with differing protocols. Although corticosteroids may hasten improvement, there does not appear to be a mortality benefit in heterogeneous patients with sepsis, leaving their role uncertain. SUMMARY: Recent negative studies have questioned the role of previously promising adjunctive treatments. However, recent clinical trials and meta-analytic data continue to refine the relative importance of various components of sepsis bundles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)295-300
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent Opinion in Critical Care
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1 2012
Externally publishedYes


  • albumin
  • lactate clearance
  • resuscitation
  • sepsis
  • vasopressor


Dive into the research topics of 'Emergency management of severe sepsis and septic shock'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this