This study used eye-tracking to understand how the order of note sections influences the way physicians read electronic progress notes. Participants (n=7) wore an eye-tracking device while reviewing progress notes for four patient cases and then provided a verbal summary. We reviewed and analyzed verbal summaries and eye tracking recordings. Wide variation in reading behaviors existed. There was no relationship between time spent reading a section and section origin of verbal summaries.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Title of host publication||MEDINFO 2019|
|Subtitle of host publication||Health and Wellbeing e-Networks for All - Proceedings of the 17th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics|
|Editors||Brigitte Seroussi, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Brigitte Seroussi|
|Number of pages||2|
|State||Published - Aug 21 2019|
|Event||17th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics, MEDINFO 2019 - Lyon, France|
Duration: Aug 25 2019 → Aug 30 2019
|Name||Studies in health technology and informatics|
|Conference||17th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics, MEDINFO 2019|
|Period||8/25/19 → 8/30/19|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
We would like to acknowledge Osadebamwen Ighile, MBBS, MS and Oladimeji Farri MBBS, PhD for contributions to this study. This work was supported by the Agency For Healthcare research and Quality Award #R01HS022085 (GM) and National Science Foundation Award #CMMI-1150057 (JM).
© 2019 International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) and IOS Press. This article is published online with Open Access by IOS Press and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
- Electronic health records
- Health communication
- Electronic Health Records
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article