Electrode placement in transcranial direct current stimulation—how reliable is the determination of C3/C4?

Tonya L. Rich, Bernadette T Gillick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The 10/20 electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements system often guides electrode placement for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation. One targeted region of the brain is the primary motor cortex (M1) for motor recovery after stroke, among other clinical indications. M1 is identified by C3 and C4 of the 10/20 EEG system yet the reliability of 10/20 EEG measurements by novice research raters is unknown. We investigated the reliability of the 10/20 EEG measurements for C3 and C4 in 25 adult participants. Two novice raters were assessed for inter-rater reliability. Both raters received two hours of instruction from a registered neurodiagnostic technician. One of the raters completed the measurements across two testing days for intra-rater reliability. Relative reliability was determined using the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and absolute reliability. We observed a low to fair inter and intra-rater ICC for motor cortex measurements. The absolute reliability was <1.0 cm by different novice raters and on different days. Although a low error was observed, consideration of the integrity of the targeted region of the brain is critical when designing tDCS interventions in clinical populations who may have compromised brain structure, due to a lesion or altered anatomy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number69
JournalBrain Sciences
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2019

Fingerprint

Electroencephalography
Electrodes
Motor Cortex
Brain
Anatomy
Stroke
Research
Population
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Keywords

  • Adults
  • Children
  • Electroencephalogram
  • Neuroplasticity
  • Non-invasive brain stimulation
  • Stroke
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation

Cite this

Electrode placement in transcranial direct current stimulation—how reliable is the determination of C3/C4? / Rich, Tonya L.; Gillick, Bernadette T.

In: Brain Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 3, 69, 01.03.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{01ed46e25e2a4245ad482b2454328576,
title = "Electrode placement in transcranial direct current stimulation—how reliable is the determination of C3/C4?",
abstract = "The 10/20 electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements system often guides electrode placement for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation. One targeted region of the brain is the primary motor cortex (M1) for motor recovery after stroke, among other clinical indications. M1 is identified by C3 and C4 of the 10/20 EEG system yet the reliability of 10/20 EEG measurements by novice research raters is unknown. We investigated the reliability of the 10/20 EEG measurements for C3 and C4 in 25 adult participants. Two novice raters were assessed for inter-rater reliability. Both raters received two hours of instruction from a registered neurodiagnostic technician. One of the raters completed the measurements across two testing days for intra-rater reliability. Relative reliability was determined using the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and absolute reliability. We observed a low to fair inter and intra-rater ICC for motor cortex measurements. The absolute reliability was <1.0 cm by different novice raters and on different days. Although a low error was observed, consideration of the integrity of the targeted region of the brain is critical when designing tDCS interventions in clinical populations who may have compromised brain structure, due to a lesion or altered anatomy.",
keywords = "Adults, Children, Electroencephalogram, Neuroplasticity, Non-invasive brain stimulation, Stroke, Transcranial direct current stimulation",
author = "Rich, {Tonya L.} and Gillick, {Bernadette T}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3390/brainsci9030069",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "Brain Sciences",
issn = "2076-3425",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrode placement in transcranial direct current stimulation—how reliable is the determination of C3/C4?

AU - Rich, Tonya L.

AU - Gillick, Bernadette T

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - The 10/20 electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements system often guides electrode placement for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation. One targeted region of the brain is the primary motor cortex (M1) for motor recovery after stroke, among other clinical indications. M1 is identified by C3 and C4 of the 10/20 EEG system yet the reliability of 10/20 EEG measurements by novice research raters is unknown. We investigated the reliability of the 10/20 EEG measurements for C3 and C4 in 25 adult participants. Two novice raters were assessed for inter-rater reliability. Both raters received two hours of instruction from a registered neurodiagnostic technician. One of the raters completed the measurements across two testing days for intra-rater reliability. Relative reliability was determined using the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and absolute reliability. We observed a low to fair inter and intra-rater ICC for motor cortex measurements. The absolute reliability was <1.0 cm by different novice raters and on different days. Although a low error was observed, consideration of the integrity of the targeted region of the brain is critical when designing tDCS interventions in clinical populations who may have compromised brain structure, due to a lesion or altered anatomy.

AB - The 10/20 electroencephalogram (EEG) measurements system often guides electrode placement for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation. One targeted region of the brain is the primary motor cortex (M1) for motor recovery after stroke, among other clinical indications. M1 is identified by C3 and C4 of the 10/20 EEG system yet the reliability of 10/20 EEG measurements by novice research raters is unknown. We investigated the reliability of the 10/20 EEG measurements for C3 and C4 in 25 adult participants. Two novice raters were assessed for inter-rater reliability. Both raters received two hours of instruction from a registered neurodiagnostic technician. One of the raters completed the measurements across two testing days for intra-rater reliability. Relative reliability was determined using the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and absolute reliability. We observed a low to fair inter and intra-rater ICC for motor cortex measurements. The absolute reliability was <1.0 cm by different novice raters and on different days. Although a low error was observed, consideration of the integrity of the targeted region of the brain is critical when designing tDCS interventions in clinical populations who may have compromised brain structure, due to a lesion or altered anatomy.

KW - Adults

KW - Children

KW - Electroencephalogram

KW - Neuroplasticity

KW - Non-invasive brain stimulation

KW - Stroke

KW - Transcranial direct current stimulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067612357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067612357&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/brainsci9030069

DO - 10.3390/brainsci9030069

M3 - Article

C2 - 30909374

AN - SCOPUS:85067612357

VL - 9

JO - Brain Sciences

JF - Brain Sciences

SN - 2076-3425

IS - 3

M1 - 69

ER -