TY - GEN
T1 - Efficiently generalizing ultra-cold atomic simulations via inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory from two-to three-dimensions
AU - Freericks, J. K.
AU - Krishnamurthy, H. R.
AU - Carrier, P.
AU - Saad, Yousef
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - We describe techniques that we are implementing to move inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory simulations from two-to three-dimensions. Two-dimensional simulations typically run on 2,000-10,000 lattice sites, while three-dimensional simulations typically need to run on 1,000,000 or more lattice sites. The inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory requires the diagonal of the inverse of many sparse matrices with the same sparsity pattern, and a dimension equal to the number of lattice-sites. For two-dimensional systems, we have employed general dense LAPACK routines since the matrices are small enough. For three-dimensional systems, we need to employ sparse matrix techniques. Here, we present one possible strategy for the sparse matrix routine, based on the well-known Lanczos technique, with a long run of the algorithm and (partial) reorthogonalization. This approach is about two-times faster than the LAPACK routines with identical accuracy, and hence will become the standard we use on the two-dimensional problems. We illustrate this approach on the problem of increasing the efficiency for pre-forming dipolar molecules in K-Rb mixtures on a lattice. We compare the local density approximation to inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory to illustrate how the local density approximation fails at low-temperature, and to illustrate the benefits of the new algorithms. For a three-dimensional problem, a speed-up of 1,000 or more times is needed. We end by discussing some options that are promising toward reaching this goal.
AB - We describe techniques that we are implementing to move inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory simulations from two-to three-dimensions. Two-dimensional simulations typically run on 2,000-10,000 lattice sites, while three-dimensional simulations typically need to run on 1,000,000 or more lattice sites. The inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory requires the diagonal of the inverse of many sparse matrices with the same sparsity pattern, and a dimension equal to the number of lattice-sites. For two-dimensional systems, we have employed general dense LAPACK routines since the matrices are small enough. For three-dimensional systems, we need to employ sparse matrix techniques. Here, we present one possible strategy for the sparse matrix routine, based on the well-known Lanczos technique, with a long run of the algorithm and (partial) reorthogonalization. This approach is about two-times faster than the LAPACK routines with identical accuracy, and hence will become the standard we use on the two-dimensional problems. We illustrate this approach on the problem of increasing the efficiency for pre-forming dipolar molecules in K-Rb mixtures on a lattice. We compare the local density approximation to inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory to illustrate how the local density approximation fails at low-temperature, and to illustrate the benefits of the new algorithms. For a three-dimensional problem, a speed-up of 1,000 or more times is needed. We end by discussing some options that are promising toward reaching this goal.
KW - Bose atoms
KW - Inhomogeneous dynamical mean-field theory
KW - mxitures of Fermi
KW - preforming dipolar matter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053374360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053374360&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/HPCMP-UGC.2010.17
DO - 10.1109/HPCMP-UGC.2010.17
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:80053374360
SN - 9780769543925
T3 - Proceedings - 2010 DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program Users Group Conference, HPCMP UGC 2010
SP - 221
EP - 227
BT - Proceedings - 2010 DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program Users Group Conference, HPCMP UGC 2010
T2 - 2010 DoD High Performance Computing Modernization Program Users Group Conference, HPCMP UGC 2010
Y2 - 14 June 2010 through 17 June 2010
ER -