Efficiencies of balance: Technical efficiency, popular efficiency, and arbitrary standards in the late progressive era USA

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Arbitrary measures of efficiency unsettle the dichotomy between engineering efficiency and efficiency in more popular forms: this dichotomy runs through the literature on the progressive era USA. Arbitrary efficiency standards were developed late in the progressive era for use in cases where ideal or theoretical efficiency could not be calculated. Arbitrary standards mediated between technical efficiency and efficiency's other forms, and illustrate important similarities between them. Examples of technical efficiency from Engineering Magazine, a prominent engineering journal, and of personal efficiency from the Independent, a prominent general interest journal of reform, reveal a common emphasis on efficiency as a tool of balance. In both, efficiency was a tool to help guarantee regularity, stability, and reliability, and used similar techniques of control, including continual surveillance and adjustment and deference to outside authority. Arbitrary measures of efficiency crossed the boundaries between the technical and personal, and underscore a shared foundation in their reliance on expertise.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)323-349
Number of pages27
JournalSocial Studies of Science
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Control
  • Efficiency
  • Engineering
  • Expertise
  • Progressive era
  • Progressivism
  • Reform
  • Scientific management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficiencies of balance: Technical efficiency, popular efficiency, and arbitrary standards in the late progressive era USA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this