TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of ridinilazole compared with vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection
T2 - a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study
AU - Vickers, Richard J.
AU - Tillotson, Glenn S.
AU - Nathan, Richard
AU - Hazan, Sabine
AU - Pullman, John
AU - Lucasti, Christopher
AU - Deck, Kenneth
AU - Yacyshyn, Bruce
AU - Maliakkal, Benedict
AU - Pesant, Yves
AU - Tejura, Bina
AU - Roblin, David
AU - Gerding, Dale N.
AU - Wilcox, Mark H.
AU - Bhan, Amit
AU - Campbell, Wayne
AU - Chopra, Teena
AU - Deck, Kenneth
AU - Golan, Yoav
AU - Gordon, Ian
AU - Kamepalli, Ravi
AU - Khanna, Sahil
AU - Lee, Christine
AU - Lucasti, Christopher
AU - Maliakkal, Benedict
AU - Minang, Irene
AU - Mullane, Kathleen
AU - Nathan, Richard
AU - Oughton, Matthew
AU - Pesant, Yves
AU - Phillips, John
AU - Pullman, John
AU - Riska, Paul
AU - Schrock, Christian
AU - Siegel, Jonathan
AU - Steinberg, Alon
AU - Talan, David
AU - Tamang, Stephen
AU - Tan, Michael
AU - Weiss, Karl
AU - Wang, Chia
AU - Yacyshyn, Bruce
AU - Young, Jo Anne
AU - Zenilman, Jonathan
AU - CoDIFy study group
AU - CoDIFy study group
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Background Clostridium difficile infection is the most common health-care-associated infection in the USA. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ridinilazole versus vancomycin for treatment of C difficile infection. Methods We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study. Participants with signs and symptoms of C difficile infection and a positive diagnostic test result were recruited from 33 centres in the USA and Canada and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral ridinilazole (200 mg every 12 h) or oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) for 10 days. The primary endpoint was achievement of a sustained clinical response, defined as clinical cure at the end of treatment and no recurrence within 30 days, which was used to establish non-inferiority (15% margin) of ridinilazole versus vancomycin. The primary efficacy analysis was done on a modified intention-to-treat population comprising all individuals with C difficile infection confirmed by the presence of free toxin in stool who were randomly assigned to receive one or more doses of the study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02092935. Findings Between June 26, 2014, and August 31, 2015, 100 patients were recruited; 50 were randomly assigned to receive ridinilazole and 50 to vancomycin. 16 patients did not complete the study, and 11 discontinued treatment early. The primary efficacy analysis included 69 patients (n=36 in the ridinilazole group; n=33 in the vancomycin group). 24 of 36 (66·7%) patients in the ridinilazole group versus 14 of 33 (42·4%) of those in the vancomycin group had a sustained clinical response (treatment difference 21·1%, 90% CI 3·1–39·1, p=0·0004), establishing the non-inferiority of ridinilazole and also showing statistical superiority at the 10% level. Ridinilazole was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of vancomycin: 82% (41 of 50) of participants reported adverse events in the ridinilazole group and 80% (40 of 50) in the vancomycin group. There were no adverse events related to ridinilazole that led to discontinuation. Interpretation Ridinilazole is a targeted-spectrum antimicrobial that shows potential in treatment of initial C difficile infection and in providing sustained benefit through reduction in disease recurrence. Further clinical development is warranted. Funding Wellcome Trust and Summit Therapeutics.
AB - Background Clostridium difficile infection is the most common health-care-associated infection in the USA. We assessed the safety and efficacy of ridinilazole versus vancomycin for treatment of C difficile infection. Methods We did a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study. Participants with signs and symptoms of C difficile infection and a positive diagnostic test result were recruited from 33 centres in the USA and Canada and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral ridinilazole (200 mg every 12 h) or oral vancomycin (125 mg every 6 h) for 10 days. The primary endpoint was achievement of a sustained clinical response, defined as clinical cure at the end of treatment and no recurrence within 30 days, which was used to establish non-inferiority (15% margin) of ridinilazole versus vancomycin. The primary efficacy analysis was done on a modified intention-to-treat population comprising all individuals with C difficile infection confirmed by the presence of free toxin in stool who were randomly assigned to receive one or more doses of the study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02092935. Findings Between June 26, 2014, and August 31, 2015, 100 patients were recruited; 50 were randomly assigned to receive ridinilazole and 50 to vancomycin. 16 patients did not complete the study, and 11 discontinued treatment early. The primary efficacy analysis included 69 patients (n=36 in the ridinilazole group; n=33 in the vancomycin group). 24 of 36 (66·7%) patients in the ridinilazole group versus 14 of 33 (42·4%) of those in the vancomycin group had a sustained clinical response (treatment difference 21·1%, 90% CI 3·1–39·1, p=0·0004), establishing the non-inferiority of ridinilazole and also showing statistical superiority at the 10% level. Ridinilazole was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of vancomycin: 82% (41 of 50) of participants reported adverse events in the ridinilazole group and 80% (40 of 50) in the vancomycin group. There were no adverse events related to ridinilazole that led to discontinuation. Interpretation Ridinilazole is a targeted-spectrum antimicrobial that shows potential in treatment of initial C difficile infection and in providing sustained benefit through reduction in disease recurrence. Further clinical development is warranted. Funding Wellcome Trust and Summit Therapeutics.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018283722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018283722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30235-9
DO - 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30235-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 28461207
AN - SCOPUS:85018283722
SN - 1473-3099
VL - 17
SP - 735
EP - 744
JO - The Lancet Infectious Diseases
JF - The Lancet Infectious Diseases
IS - 7
ER -