TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of math anxiety and perfectionism on timed versus untimed math testing in mathematically gifted sixth graders
AU - Tsui, Joanne M.
AU - Mazzocco, Michèle M M
PY - 2006/12/1
Y1 - 2006/12/1
N2 - This study was designed to examine the effects of math anxiety and perfectionism on math performance, under timed testing conditions, among mathematically gifted sixth graders. We found that participants had worse math performance during timed versus untimed testing, but this difference was statistically significant only when the timed condition preceded the untimed condition. We also found that children with higher levels of either math anxiety or perfectionism had a smaller performance discrepancy during timed versus untimed testing, relative to children with lower levels of math anxiety or perfectionism. There were no statistically significant gender differences in overall test performance, nor in levels of math anxiety or perfectionism; however, the difference between performance on timed and untimed math testing was statistically significant for girls, but not for boys. Implications for educators are discussed. © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
AB - This study was designed to examine the effects of math anxiety and perfectionism on math performance, under timed testing conditions, among mathematically gifted sixth graders. We found that participants had worse math performance during timed versus untimed testing, but this difference was statistically significant only when the timed condition preceded the untimed condition. We also found that children with higher levels of either math anxiety or perfectionism had a smaller performance discrepancy during timed versus untimed testing, relative to children with lower levels of math anxiety or perfectionism. There were no statistically significant gender differences in overall test performance, nor in levels of math anxiety or perfectionism; however, the difference between performance on timed and untimed math testing was statistically significant for girls, but not for boys. Implications for educators are discussed. © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007877483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007877483&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02783190709554397
DO - 10.1080/02783190709554397
M3 - Article
SN - 0278-3193
VL - 29
SP - 132
EP - 139
JO - Roeper Review
JF - Roeper Review
IS - 2
ER -