Effects of internal defibrillation on an implanted pacing system with programmable polarity

D. S. Khoury, W. X. Zhu, J. Nitta, C. Rizo-Patron, J. D. Maloney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Management of multiple cardiac arrhythmias in some patients with both an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and a pacemaker has demonstrated several advantages. In such circumstances, it is imperative that pacemaker function and its programmed parameters be preserved following a defibrillation shock. This article describes the effects encountered by a specific programmable polarity pacemaker (Relay® 294-03) when subjected to electrical defibrillation in a canine model. Three pacemakers were repeatedly tested in three separate dog experiments. Each pacemaker, with its leads implanted in the right atrium and the right ventricle, was subjected to a minimum total number of 24 high energy biphasic and monophasic shocks (600-700 V) delivered by a coexisting ICD system using three different defibrillating lead configurations. None of the pacemaker systems showed any failure in function; all pacemakers continued to function within preshock specification and conversion to unipolar pacing and/or backup mode was not observed in any of the tests. Intracardiac electrical potentials measured directly off the ICD and the pacemaker leads, during a defibrillation shock (mean 566.6 V; 23.7 J), showed that potentials measured in a bipolar configuration (tip-ring: mean 21.0 V in atrium, 12.0 V in ventricle) were significantly less than potentials measured in a unipolar configuration (tip-can: mean 387.9 V in atrium, 394.0 V in ventricle; ring-can: mean 405.6 V in atrium, 395.4 V in ventricle). Our compatibility tests demonstrate that use of this programmable-polarity pacemaker in concert with an ICD system appears to be safe. Testing similar to the present study should be conducted prior to complete clinical acceptance of combined ICD and pacemaker implantation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-193
Number of pages6
JournalPACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume18
Issue number1 II
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Shock
Heart Atria
Heart Ventricles
Canidae
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Dogs

Keywords

  • implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • programmable-polarity pacemaker

Cite this

Effects of internal defibrillation on an implanted pacing system with programmable polarity. / Khoury, D. S.; Zhu, W. X.; Nitta, J.; Rizo-Patron, C.; Maloney, J. D.

In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, Vol. 18, No. 1 II, 1995, p. 188-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Khoury, D. S. ; Zhu, W. X. ; Nitta, J. ; Rizo-Patron, C. ; Maloney, J. D. / Effects of internal defibrillation on an implanted pacing system with programmable polarity. In: PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 1995 ; Vol. 18, No. 1 II. pp. 188-193.
@article{98ed2e88624a47b2967b297b4c42d016,
title = "Effects of internal defibrillation on an implanted pacing system with programmable polarity",
abstract = "Management of multiple cardiac arrhythmias in some patients with both an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and a pacemaker has demonstrated several advantages. In such circumstances, it is imperative that pacemaker function and its programmed parameters be preserved following a defibrillation shock. This article describes the effects encountered by a specific programmable polarity pacemaker (Relay{\circledR} 294-03) when subjected to electrical defibrillation in a canine model. Three pacemakers were repeatedly tested in three separate dog experiments. Each pacemaker, with its leads implanted in the right atrium and the right ventricle, was subjected to a minimum total number of 24 high energy biphasic and monophasic shocks (600-700 V) delivered by a coexisting ICD system using three different defibrillating lead configurations. None of the pacemaker systems showed any failure in function; all pacemakers continued to function within preshock specification and conversion to unipolar pacing and/or backup mode was not observed in any of the tests. Intracardiac electrical potentials measured directly off the ICD and the pacemaker leads, during a defibrillation shock (mean 566.6 V; 23.7 J), showed that potentials measured in a bipolar configuration (tip-ring: mean 21.0 V in atrium, 12.0 V in ventricle) were significantly less than potentials measured in a unipolar configuration (tip-can: mean 387.9 V in atrium, 394.0 V in ventricle; ring-can: mean 405.6 V in atrium, 395.4 V in ventricle). Our compatibility tests demonstrate that use of this programmable-polarity pacemaker in concert with an ICD system appears to be safe. Testing similar to the present study should be conducted prior to complete clinical acceptance of combined ICD and pacemaker implantation.",
keywords = "implantable cardioverter defibrillator, programmable-polarity pacemaker",
author = "Khoury, {D. S.} and Zhu, {W. X.} and J. Nitta and C. Rizo-Patron and Maloney, {J. D.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02502.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "188--193",
journal = "PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology",
issn = "0147-8389",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1 II",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of internal defibrillation on an implanted pacing system with programmable polarity

AU - Khoury, D. S.

AU - Zhu, W. X.

AU - Nitta, J.

AU - Rizo-Patron, C.

AU - Maloney, J. D.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Management of multiple cardiac arrhythmias in some patients with both an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and a pacemaker has demonstrated several advantages. In such circumstances, it is imperative that pacemaker function and its programmed parameters be preserved following a defibrillation shock. This article describes the effects encountered by a specific programmable polarity pacemaker (Relay® 294-03) when subjected to electrical defibrillation in a canine model. Three pacemakers were repeatedly tested in three separate dog experiments. Each pacemaker, with its leads implanted in the right atrium and the right ventricle, was subjected to a minimum total number of 24 high energy biphasic and monophasic shocks (600-700 V) delivered by a coexisting ICD system using three different defibrillating lead configurations. None of the pacemaker systems showed any failure in function; all pacemakers continued to function within preshock specification and conversion to unipolar pacing and/or backup mode was not observed in any of the tests. Intracardiac electrical potentials measured directly off the ICD and the pacemaker leads, during a defibrillation shock (mean 566.6 V; 23.7 J), showed that potentials measured in a bipolar configuration (tip-ring: mean 21.0 V in atrium, 12.0 V in ventricle) were significantly less than potentials measured in a unipolar configuration (tip-can: mean 387.9 V in atrium, 394.0 V in ventricle; ring-can: mean 405.6 V in atrium, 395.4 V in ventricle). Our compatibility tests demonstrate that use of this programmable-polarity pacemaker in concert with an ICD system appears to be safe. Testing similar to the present study should be conducted prior to complete clinical acceptance of combined ICD and pacemaker implantation.

AB - Management of multiple cardiac arrhythmias in some patients with both an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and a pacemaker has demonstrated several advantages. In such circumstances, it is imperative that pacemaker function and its programmed parameters be preserved following a defibrillation shock. This article describes the effects encountered by a specific programmable polarity pacemaker (Relay® 294-03) when subjected to electrical defibrillation in a canine model. Three pacemakers were repeatedly tested in three separate dog experiments. Each pacemaker, with its leads implanted in the right atrium and the right ventricle, was subjected to a minimum total number of 24 high energy biphasic and monophasic shocks (600-700 V) delivered by a coexisting ICD system using three different defibrillating lead configurations. None of the pacemaker systems showed any failure in function; all pacemakers continued to function within preshock specification and conversion to unipolar pacing and/or backup mode was not observed in any of the tests. Intracardiac electrical potentials measured directly off the ICD and the pacemaker leads, during a defibrillation shock (mean 566.6 V; 23.7 J), showed that potentials measured in a bipolar configuration (tip-ring: mean 21.0 V in atrium, 12.0 V in ventricle) were significantly less than potentials measured in a unipolar configuration (tip-can: mean 387.9 V in atrium, 394.0 V in ventricle; ring-can: mean 405.6 V in atrium, 395.4 V in ventricle). Our compatibility tests demonstrate that use of this programmable-polarity pacemaker in concert with an ICD system appears to be safe. Testing similar to the present study should be conducted prior to complete clinical acceptance of combined ICD and pacemaker implantation.

KW - implantable cardioverter defibrillator

KW - programmable-polarity pacemaker

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028893874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028893874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02502.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02502.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 7724397

AN - SCOPUS:0028893874

VL - 18

SP - 188

EP - 193

JO - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

JF - PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology

SN - 0147-8389

IS - 1 II

ER -