TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Including Malting Industry Byproducts in Feedlot Diets on Performance and Beef Quality
AU - Dahlen, C. R.
AU - Zehnder, C. M.
AU - DiCostanzo, Alfredo
AU - Lamb, G. C.
AU - Miller, L. R.
AU - Chester-Jones, Hugh
AU - Hachmeister, K. A.
AU - Dikeman, M. E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2005 American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists
PY - 2005/2/1
Y1 - 2005/2/1
N2 - Eighty crossbred steers (436 kg) were used to determine effects of including a malting industry byproduct blend (MB) in finishing diets on performance, DM digestibility, carcass characteristics, meat color, tenderness, and sensory traits. Steers, blocked by BW, were randomly assigned to 1 of 16 pens. Dietary treatments (DM basis) were 1 (control) [78% corn grain (CG), 16% corn silage (S), 6% supplement (SUPP)]; 2 [66% CG, 11% S, 20% wet corn gluten feed (WGF), 3% SUPP]; 3 (64% CG, 13% S, 20% MB, 3% SUPP); and 4 [55% CG, 21% S, 14% MB, 7% condensed distillers’ solubles (DS), 3% SUPP]. Steers on Treatment 1 gained faster (P<0.05) than those on Treatments 3 or 4. Steers on Treatment 2 posted ADG that were intermediate to those of steers on the control treatment or on Treatments 3 or 4. Steers on Treatment 3 or 4 gained less efficiently (P<0.01) than those on the control treatment or Treatment 2. Diets fed to steers in the control group or in the group on Treatment 2 were more digestible and had greater estimated concentrations of ME (P<0.05) than those fed to steers on Treatments 3 and 4. The energy value of MB was estimated to range from 2.62 to 2.68 Mcal ME/kg of DM. Neither cooking loss nor Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (WBSF) was affected by dietary treatment. Steaks from steers on Treatment 4 were redder (greater a* values; P<0.05) than steaks from steers on Treatment 2. Results indicate that substituting some CG and S or all WGF in CG-based diets with MB alone or in combination with DS reduced diet DM digestibility and feed efficiency, but had no adverse effects on meat tenderness or sensory traits.
AB - Eighty crossbred steers (436 kg) were used to determine effects of including a malting industry byproduct blend (MB) in finishing diets on performance, DM digestibility, carcass characteristics, meat color, tenderness, and sensory traits. Steers, blocked by BW, were randomly assigned to 1 of 16 pens. Dietary treatments (DM basis) were 1 (control) [78% corn grain (CG), 16% corn silage (S), 6% supplement (SUPP)]; 2 [66% CG, 11% S, 20% wet corn gluten feed (WGF), 3% SUPP]; 3 (64% CG, 13% S, 20% MB, 3% SUPP); and 4 [55% CG, 21% S, 14% MB, 7% condensed distillers’ solubles (DS), 3% SUPP]. Steers on Treatment 1 gained faster (P<0.05) than those on Treatments 3 or 4. Steers on Treatment 2 posted ADG that were intermediate to those of steers on the control treatment or on Treatments 3 or 4. Steers on Treatment 3 or 4 gained less efficiently (P<0.01) than those on the control treatment or Treatment 2. Diets fed to steers in the control group or in the group on Treatment 2 were more digestible and had greater estimated concentrations of ME (P<0.05) than those fed to steers on Treatments 3 and 4. The energy value of MB was estimated to range from 2.62 to 2.68 Mcal ME/kg of DM. Neither cooking loss nor Warner-Bratzler Shear Force (WBSF) was affected by dietary treatment. Steaks from steers on Treatment 4 were redder (greater a* values; P<0.05) than steaks from steers on Treatment 2. Results indicate that substituting some CG and S or all WGF in CG-based diets with MB alone or in combination with DS reduced diet DM digestibility and feed efficiency, but had no adverse effects on meat tenderness or sensory traits.
KW - Byproducts
KW - Cattle
KW - Digestibility
KW - Malting Industry
KW - Meat Quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008234836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008234836&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31162-1
DO - 10.15232/S1080-7446(15)31162-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008234836
SN - 1080-7446
VL - 21
SP - 22
EP - 29
JO - Professional Animal Scientist
JF - Professional Animal Scientist
IS - 1
ER -