Abstract
Long-term (13 y) experimental P enrichment of a 4th-order reach of the Kuparuk River (North Slope, Alaska) had little effect on the distribution, abundance, or metabolism of a common, clump-forming bryophyte (Schistidium [Grimmia] agassizii), but promoted rapid and extensive growth by mat-forming, streamer bryophytes (Hygrohypnum alpestre and H. ochraceum) that formerly were rare in the river. In previous research we showed that there were important physiological differences (i.e., photosynthetic efficiency) that helped explain why S. agassizii was able to persist in the river under cold, oligotrophic conditions, whereas H. alpestre and H. ochraceum were not. Here we hypothesize that S. agassizii should be more tolerant than Hygrohypnum spp. to desiccation stress, and that Hygrohypnum spp. would take greater advantage (e.g., greater rates of net primary production) than S. agassizii of elevated temperatures. We did laboratory experiments using small-scale metabolism chambers to test this hypothesis. Desiccation affected net photosynthesis more in Hygrohypnum spp. than in S. agassizii. Hygrohypnum spp. had a greater tolerance to temperatures >20°C than S. agassizii. Further, net photosynthetic rates (at light saturation) were significantly higher for Hygrohypnum spp. (1676-6342 μg O2 g-1 dry mass [dm] h-1) than for S. agassizii (428-1163 μg O2 g-1dm h-1) at all temperatures measured. In fact, S. agassizii showed minimal response to increases in light availability and recovered rapidly from desiccation, but was inhibited by high temperature. In contrast, Hygrohypnum spp. were susceptible to desiccation, and responded strongly to increased light and temperature. The physiological attributes we measured helped explain the distribution of our test species in arctic tundra streams.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 263-273 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of the North American Benthological Society |
Volume | 19 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2000 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Bruce J. Peterson, Jim F. Haney, Alan L. Baker, Christopher T. Robinson, and F. S. Chapin provided helpful reviews of earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank the staff at Toolik Lake Field Station for their logistical support. This research was supported primarily by a grant from the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs (OPP-9400722) and is a contribution to the NSF Arctic Long-Term Ecosystem Research Program. The Department of Natural Resources and the Graduate School, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, provided additional support. The thoughtful comments of 2 anonymous reviewers, C. G. Peterson, and D. M. Rosenberg considerably improved the manuscript.
Funding Information:
Bruce J. Peterson, Jim F. Haney, Alan L. Baker, Christopher T. Robinson, and F. S. Chapin provided helpful reviews of earlier versions of this manuscript. We thank the staff at Toolik Lake Field Station for their logistical support. This research was supported primarily by a grant from the National Science Foundation Office of Polar Programs (OPP-9400722) and is a contribution to the NSF Arctic Long-Term Ecosystem Research Program. The Department of Natural Resources and the Graduate School, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, provided additional support. The thoughtful comments of 2 anonymous reviewers, C. G. Pe-terson, and D. M. Rosenberg considerably improved the manuscript.
Keywords
- Arctic Alaska
- Desiccation
- Hygrohypnum alpestre
- Hygrohypnum ochraceum
- Kuparuk River
- Phosphorus
- Photosynthesis
- Schistidium agassizii
- Stress physiology
- Temperature