Effectiveness of Mental Health First Aid: a meta-analysis

Amy K. Maslowski, Rick A. LaCaille, Lara J. LaCaille, Catherine M. Reich, Jill Klingner

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper, a meta-analysis and systematic review of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), is to focus on studies that reported trainees’ mental health literacy, attitudes and helping-related behaviors, as well as the impact of the program for the people who came into contact with trainees (i.e. recipients). Design/methodology/approach: A systematic search included several online databases of published studies, dissertations or theses, and journals commonly publishing research in this area. Studies were randomized or non-randomized control trials using an intervention based upon the adult or youth MHFA curriculum. Findings: Of the 8,257 initial articles, 16 met inclusion criteria. Small-to-moderate effect sizes (Hedges’ g=0.18–0.53) were found for the primary outcomes for the trainees with effects appearing to be maintained at follow-up. Study quality was inversely associated with effect size. No evidence of investigator allegiance was detected. Few studies examined the effects for those who received aid from a MHFA trainee. Preliminary quantitative evidence appeared lacking (Hedges’ g=−0.04 to 0.12); furthermore, a qualitative review found limited positive effects. Research limitations/implications: MHFA trainees appear to benefit from MHFA; however, objective behavioral changes are in need of greater emphasis. Additionally, considerably greater attention and effort in testing effects on distressed recipients is needed with future empirical investigations. Originality/value: This is the first known review that includes preliminary findings on the effects of MHFA on the distressed recipients of the aid. It is anticipated that this will prompt further investigation into the impact of MHFA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-261
Number of pages17
JournalMental Health Review Journal
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 28 2019

Fingerprint

First Aid
Meta-Analysis
Mental Health
Helping Behavior
Health Literacy
Attitude to Health
Research
Curriculum
Research Personnel
Databases

Keywords

  • Mental Health First Aid (MHFA)
  • Mental health gatekeeper
  • Mental health literacy
  • Mental health training
  • Stigma

Cite this

Effectiveness of Mental Health First Aid : a meta-analysis. / Maslowski, Amy K.; LaCaille, Rick A.; LaCaille, Lara J.; Reich, Catherine M.; Klingner, Jill.

In: Mental Health Review Journal, Vol. 24, No. 4, 28.11.2019, p. 245-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{8ab2de2cf8df43a6bc0279a9499fba2a,
title = "Effectiveness of Mental Health First Aid: a meta-analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper, a meta-analysis and systematic review of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), is to focus on studies that reported trainees’ mental health literacy, attitudes and helping-related behaviors, as well as the impact of the program for the people who came into contact with trainees (i.e. recipients). Design/methodology/approach: A systematic search included several online databases of published studies, dissertations or theses, and journals commonly publishing research in this area. Studies were randomized or non-randomized control trials using an intervention based upon the adult or youth MHFA curriculum. Findings: Of the 8,257 initial articles, 16 met inclusion criteria. Small-to-moderate effect sizes (Hedges’ g=0.18–0.53) were found for the primary outcomes for the trainees with effects appearing to be maintained at follow-up. Study quality was inversely associated with effect size. No evidence of investigator allegiance was detected. Few studies examined the effects for those who received aid from a MHFA trainee. Preliminary quantitative evidence appeared lacking (Hedges’ g=−0.04 to 0.12); furthermore, a qualitative review found limited positive effects. Research limitations/implications: MHFA trainees appear to benefit from MHFA; however, objective behavioral changes are in need of greater emphasis. Additionally, considerably greater attention and effort in testing effects on distressed recipients is needed with future empirical investigations. Originality/value: This is the first known review that includes preliminary findings on the effects of MHFA on the distressed recipients of the aid. It is anticipated that this will prompt further investigation into the impact of MHFA.",
keywords = "Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), Mental health gatekeeper, Mental health literacy, Mental health training, Stigma",
author = "Maslowski, {Amy K.} and LaCaille, {Rick A.} and LaCaille, {Lara J.} and Reich, {Catherine M.} and Jill Klingner",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1108/MHRJ-05-2019-0016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "245--261",
journal = "Mental Health Review Journal",
issn = "1361-9322",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of Mental Health First Aid

T2 - a meta-analysis

AU - Maslowski, Amy K.

AU - LaCaille, Rick A.

AU - LaCaille, Lara J.

AU - Reich, Catherine M.

AU - Klingner, Jill

PY - 2019/11/28

Y1 - 2019/11/28

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper, a meta-analysis and systematic review of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), is to focus on studies that reported trainees’ mental health literacy, attitudes and helping-related behaviors, as well as the impact of the program for the people who came into contact with trainees (i.e. recipients). Design/methodology/approach: A systematic search included several online databases of published studies, dissertations or theses, and journals commonly publishing research in this area. Studies were randomized or non-randomized control trials using an intervention based upon the adult or youth MHFA curriculum. Findings: Of the 8,257 initial articles, 16 met inclusion criteria. Small-to-moderate effect sizes (Hedges’ g=0.18–0.53) were found for the primary outcomes for the trainees with effects appearing to be maintained at follow-up. Study quality was inversely associated with effect size. No evidence of investigator allegiance was detected. Few studies examined the effects for those who received aid from a MHFA trainee. Preliminary quantitative evidence appeared lacking (Hedges’ g=−0.04 to 0.12); furthermore, a qualitative review found limited positive effects. Research limitations/implications: MHFA trainees appear to benefit from MHFA; however, objective behavioral changes are in need of greater emphasis. Additionally, considerably greater attention and effort in testing effects on distressed recipients is needed with future empirical investigations. Originality/value: This is the first known review that includes preliminary findings on the effects of MHFA on the distressed recipients of the aid. It is anticipated that this will prompt further investigation into the impact of MHFA.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper, a meta-analysis and systematic review of Mental Health First Aid (MHFA), is to focus on studies that reported trainees’ mental health literacy, attitudes and helping-related behaviors, as well as the impact of the program for the people who came into contact with trainees (i.e. recipients). Design/methodology/approach: A systematic search included several online databases of published studies, dissertations or theses, and journals commonly publishing research in this area. Studies were randomized or non-randomized control trials using an intervention based upon the adult or youth MHFA curriculum. Findings: Of the 8,257 initial articles, 16 met inclusion criteria. Small-to-moderate effect sizes (Hedges’ g=0.18–0.53) were found for the primary outcomes for the trainees with effects appearing to be maintained at follow-up. Study quality was inversely associated with effect size. No evidence of investigator allegiance was detected. Few studies examined the effects for those who received aid from a MHFA trainee. Preliminary quantitative evidence appeared lacking (Hedges’ g=−0.04 to 0.12); furthermore, a qualitative review found limited positive effects. Research limitations/implications: MHFA trainees appear to benefit from MHFA; however, objective behavioral changes are in need of greater emphasis. Additionally, considerably greater attention and effort in testing effects on distressed recipients is needed with future empirical investigations. Originality/value: This is the first known review that includes preliminary findings on the effects of MHFA on the distressed recipients of the aid. It is anticipated that this will prompt further investigation into the impact of MHFA.

KW - Mental Health First Aid (MHFA)

KW - Mental health gatekeeper

KW - Mental health literacy

KW - Mental health training

KW - Stigma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074372138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074372138&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/MHRJ-05-2019-0016

DO - 10.1108/MHRJ-05-2019-0016

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85074372138

VL - 24

SP - 245

EP - 261

JO - Mental Health Review Journal

JF - Mental Health Review Journal

SN - 1361-9322

IS - 4

ER -