Effect of the reverse Trendelenburg position on the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in dogs anesthetized for elective stifle surgery

Colleen Hickey, Alonso GP Guedes, Martin J Kennedy, Caitlin C. Tearney, Kirby Yamamoto, Erin Wendt-Hornickle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To determine if a 15° reverse Trendelenburg position decreases the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) compared with a horizontal position in dogs anesthetized for stifle surgery. Study design: Prospective, randomized parallel-arm study. Animals: A total of 44 healthy client-owned dogs were enrolled and data from 36 dogs were analyzed. Methods: Dogs requiring preoperative radiographs under anesthesia, or with a history of gastrointestinal signs or administered gastroprotectant therapy within 1 month of surgery were excluded. Anesthesia protocol was standardized to include hydromorphone, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, propofol and isoflurane. Dogs were randomly assigned at enrollment to be positioned in a 15° reverse Trendelenburg or a horizontal position for surgery. Continuous pH monitoring was documented throughout the procedure with a 6.4 Fr (2.13 mm) esophageal pH probe positioned in the distal esophagus via the oral cavity. GER was defined as pH < 4.0 (acidic) or > 7.5 (alkaline) for more than 30 seconds. The proportions of dogs developing GER were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test. Time to reflux was compared using survival curves and the Gehan–Breslow–Wilcoxon test. Statistical significance was set as p < 0.05. Results: An episode of GER occurred in 11/36 (30%) dogs. Reflux was alkaline in two dogs and acidic in nine dogs. The proportion of dogs with GER was 5/18 (28%) and 6/18 (33%) for dogs in the reverse Trendelenburg position and horizontal position, respectively, and was not statistically significant (p > 0.99). Median (range) time until reflux was 44 (23–135) and 44.5 (9–56) minutes when dogs were positioned in reverse Trendelenburg position and horizontal position, respectively (p = 0.66; two-tailed Mann–Whitney U test). Conclusions and clinical relevance: Positioning the surgery table in a 15° rostral elevation for dogs anesthetized for elective stifle surgical procedures did not decrease the incidence of GER.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-340
Number of pages8
JournalVeterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Volume50
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors thank the University of Minnesota Small Animal Surgery service for accommodating the requirements of the study, and the Anesthesia technical staff for assisting with enrolled cases. This research was partially supported by intramural funds from the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine .

Funding Information:
The authors thank the University of Minnesota Small Animal Surgery service for accommodating the requirements of the study, and the Anesthesia technical staff for assisting with enrolled cases. This research was partially supported by intramural funds from the University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023

Keywords

  • anesthesia
  • complications
  • dogs
  • gastroesophageal reflux
  • perioperative
  • reverse Trendelenburg

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of the reverse Trendelenburg position on the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux in dogs anesthetized for elective stifle surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this