Effect of sputter-coating on cracking of root-end surfaces after ultrasonic retrograde preparation--a SEM study of resected root apices and their respective impressions.

Clovis M. Bramante, Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes, Norberti Bernardineli, Roberto Brandão Garcia, Cláudio Urra Pidero, Ronald Ordinola-Zapata, Alexandre Silva Bramante

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the effect of sputter-coating for SEM analysis on the formation of cracks on root-end surfaces after retrograde cavity preparation with ultrasonic tips. Root-end cavities were prepared with either Satelec S12/90 degrees D diamond-coated or S12/90 degrees non-coated stainless steel retrotips. Impressions were taken before and after retrograde cavity preparation. The resected root apices and their respective impressions were examined using a scanning electron microscope, and the presence, extension and numbers of cracks were recorded after each procedure. The number of cracks observed directly on the ultrasonically prepared root-end surfaces was larger than that observed in their respective impressions taken after root-end cavity preparation, which suggests that cracking was mostly produced by the sputter-coating process required for SEM analysis. Impressions of the root-end cavities prepared with non-coated ultrasonic stainless steel retrotips showed a greater incidence of cracks (3/10 impressions) than those that replicated cavities prepared with diamond-coated retrotips (1/10 impressions). No statistical difference was found between the diamond and stainless steel retrotips.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-57
Number of pages5
JournalActa odontológica latinoamericana : AOL
Volume23
Issue number1
StatePublished - Sep 7 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of sputter-coating on cracking of root-end surfaces after ultrasonic retrograde preparation--a SEM study of resected root apices and their respective impressions.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this