Effect of lymphoscintigraphy drainage patterns on sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

Anees B. Chagpar, Farid Kehdy, Charles R. Scoggins, Robert C G Martin, David J. Carlson, Alison L. Laidley, Souzan E. El-Eid, Terre Q. McGlothin, Robert D. Noyes, Phillip B. Ley, Todd M. Tuttle, Kelly M. McMasters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy examination is an accepted method of staging breast cancer patients. SLN biopsy examination in patients with drainage to the internal mammary chain (IMC) nodes is controversial. Methods: A prospective study of SLN biopsy examination followed by axillary dissection was analyzed to determine how surgeons manage patients with IMC drainage and the rates of axillary SLN identification and positivity in these cases. Results: Lymphoscintigraphy was performed in 2196 (53.2%) of the 4131 patients in this study. IMC drainage was noted in 80 patients (3.6%). An axillary SLN was identified in 29 of the 40 patients with IMC drainage alone (72.5%). The rate of finding a positive axillary lymph node did not differ based on the lymphoscintigraphic pattern (P = .470). Conclusions: Most surgeons do not perform IMC SLN biopsy procedures. Even when lymphoscintigraphy shows isolated drainage to IMC nodes, axillary SLNs usually are identified. Lymphoscintigraphy therefore has limited usefulness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-562
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume190
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Drainage
  • Internal mammary
  • Lymphoscintigraphy
  • Sentinel node biopsy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of lymphoscintigraphy drainage patterns on sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this