Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of exercise training in patients with chronotropic incompetence and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the TRAINING-HR randomized clinical trial

  • Patricia Palau
  • , Iván De Amo
  • , Gonzalo Núñez
  • , Cristina Flor
  • , Rafael De La Espriella
  • , Celia García-Conejo
  • , Sandra Estefanía Berlanga-Tovar
  • , Jose Casaña-Granell
  • , Joaquín Calatayud
  • , Eloy Domínguez
  • , Fabián Sanchis-Gomar
  • , Markus Meyer
  • , Juan Sanchis
  • , Julio Núñez
  • , Laura López

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims Chronotropic incompetence (ChI) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with a reduced exercise capacity. The role of exercise training in improving chronotropic response (ChR) and functional capacity in these patients remains uncertain. This study assessed the effects of four different exercise programmes on peak oxygen consumption (peakVO), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, and ChR in patients with the ChI HFpEF phenotype. Methods and results In this randomized clinical trial, 80 symptomatic (NYHA classes II-III/IV) patients with the ChI HFpEF phenotype were randomized (1:1:1:1) to one of four interventions: (i) a 12-week supervised aerobic training (AT) programme, (ii) AT with low-intensity strength training (AT/LRT), (iii) AT with moderate- to high-intensity strength training (AT/HRT), or (iv) non-supervised exercise recommendations (ER). The primary endpoint was the change in peakVO2 at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included changes in ChR and KCCQ. A linear regression model was used. The mean age of 80 participants was 75.1 ± 7.2 years, and 59.6% were women. Baseline values for peakVO2, chronotropic index, and KCCQ were 11.8 ± 2.6 mL/kg/min, 0.4 ± 0.2, and 63.5 ± 17.9, respectively, with no significant differences across arms. All supervised training programmes led to significant improvements in peakVO2 compared to ER: AT/HRT: Δ + 4.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9-5.1, P < 0.001], AT/LRT: Δ + 3.6 (95% CI: 2.5-4.6, P < 0.001), and AT: Δ + 2.9 (95% CI: 1.9-4.0, P < 0.001). AT/HRT was superior over AT alone: Δ + 1.1 (95% CI, 0.1-2.2, P = 0.046). Likewise, supervised exercise improved ChR and KCCQ without statistical differences between groups. Conclusion Different supervised exercise training improved peakVO2, ChR, and KCCQ in patients with ChI HFpEF phenotype.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)265-275
Number of pages11
JournalEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Chronotropic incompetence
  • Chronotropic response to exercise
  • Exercise training
  • HFpEF
  • PeakVO
  • Per cent predicted peakVO

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of exercise training in patients with chronotropic incompetence and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the TRAINING-HR randomized clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this