Effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular ejection fraction in men eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Kairav Vakil, Viorel Florea, Ryan Koene, Jessica Voight Kealhofer, Inderjit Anand, Selcuk Adabag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death is not routinely recommended within 90 days of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of the possibility of an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to>35% after revascularization. We sought to determine the incidence and predictors of EF improvement to >35% after isolated CABG in patients who had a preoperative EF ≤35%. We studied 375 patients who underwent CABG at a tertiary institution and had an echocardiogram preoperatively and postoperatively. Of these, 74 patients (20%) with a preoperative EF ≤35% were included in this analysis. Improvement in EF was defined as postoperative EF >35%. In the overall study population (n = 74), mean EF improved from 28 ± 6% preoperatively to 36 ± 12% postoperatively (p <0.0001). A total of 38 patients (51%) had postoperative improvement in EF to >35% (mean EF in these patients increased from 30 ± 5% to 46 ± 8%; p <0.0001). Patients with EF improvement had a higher preoperative EF than those with no improvement (30 ± 5% vs 26 ± 7%, p <0.005). Improvement in EF was 5 times more likely in patients with preoperative EF 26% to 35% (odds ratio 4.95, 95% CI 1.73 to 14.1; p = 0.003) than those with preoperative EF ≤25%. Other clinical characteristics were not significantly different between patients with versus without EF improvement. In conclusion, more than half of the ICD-eligible patients who underwent CABG improved their EF to >35% after surgery and became ineligible for a primary prevention ICD. EF improvement was unlikely in patients with preoperative EF <25%.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)957-960
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume117
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2016

Fingerprint

Implantable Defibrillators
Coronary Artery Bypass
Stroke Volume
Primary Prevention
Sudden Cardiac Death
Incidence
Population

Cite this

Effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular ejection fraction in men eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. / Vakil, Kairav; Florea, Viorel; Koene, Ryan; Kealhofer, Jessica Voight; Anand, Inderjit; Adabag, Selcuk.

In: American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 117, No. 6, 15.03.2016, p. 957-960.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f9f652282d034c5995acf35a10899452,
title = "Effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular ejection fraction in men eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator",
abstract = "Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death is not routinely recommended within 90 days of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of the possibility of an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to>35{\%} after revascularization. We sought to determine the incidence and predictors of EF improvement to >35{\%} after isolated CABG in patients who had a preoperative EF ≤35{\%}. We studied 375 patients who underwent CABG at a tertiary institution and had an echocardiogram preoperatively and postoperatively. Of these, 74 patients (20{\%}) with a preoperative EF ≤35{\%} were included in this analysis. Improvement in EF was defined as postoperative EF >35{\%}. In the overall study population (n = 74), mean EF improved from 28 ± 6{\%} preoperatively to 36 ± 12{\%} postoperatively (p <0.0001). A total of 38 patients (51{\%}) had postoperative improvement in EF to >35{\%} (mean EF in these patients increased from 30 ± 5{\%} to 46 ± 8{\%}; p <0.0001). Patients with EF improvement had a higher preoperative EF than those with no improvement (30 ± 5{\%} vs 26 ± 7{\%}, p <0.005). Improvement in EF was 5 times more likely in patients with preoperative EF 26{\%} to 35{\%} (odds ratio 4.95, 95{\%} CI 1.73 to 14.1; p = 0.003) than those with preoperative EF ≤25{\%}. Other clinical characteristics were not significantly different between patients with versus without EF improvement. In conclusion, more than half of the ICD-eligible patients who underwent CABG improved their EF to >35{\%} after surgery and became ineligible for a primary prevention ICD. EF improvement was unlikely in patients with preoperative EF <25{\%}.",
author = "Kairav Vakil and Viorel Florea and Ryan Koene and Kealhofer, {Jessica Voight} and Inderjit Anand and Selcuk Adabag",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.029",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "957--960",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of coronary artery bypass grafting on left ventricular ejection fraction in men eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

AU - Vakil, Kairav

AU - Florea, Viorel

AU - Koene, Ryan

AU - Kealhofer, Jessica Voight

AU - Anand, Inderjit

AU - Adabag, Selcuk

PY - 2016/3/15

Y1 - 2016/3/15

N2 - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death is not routinely recommended within 90 days of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of the possibility of an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to>35% after revascularization. We sought to determine the incidence and predictors of EF improvement to >35% after isolated CABG in patients who had a preoperative EF ≤35%. We studied 375 patients who underwent CABG at a tertiary institution and had an echocardiogram preoperatively and postoperatively. Of these, 74 patients (20%) with a preoperative EF ≤35% were included in this analysis. Improvement in EF was defined as postoperative EF >35%. In the overall study population (n = 74), mean EF improved from 28 ± 6% preoperatively to 36 ± 12% postoperatively (p <0.0001). A total of 38 patients (51%) had postoperative improvement in EF to >35% (mean EF in these patients increased from 30 ± 5% to 46 ± 8%; p <0.0001). Patients with EF improvement had a higher preoperative EF than those with no improvement (30 ± 5% vs 26 ± 7%, p <0.005). Improvement in EF was 5 times more likely in patients with preoperative EF 26% to 35% (odds ratio 4.95, 95% CI 1.73 to 14.1; p = 0.003) than those with preoperative EF ≤25%. Other clinical characteristics were not significantly different between patients with versus without EF improvement. In conclusion, more than half of the ICD-eligible patients who underwent CABG improved their EF to >35% after surgery and became ineligible for a primary prevention ICD. EF improvement was unlikely in patients with preoperative EF <25%.

AB - Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death is not routinely recommended within 90 days of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of the possibility of an improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) to>35% after revascularization. We sought to determine the incidence and predictors of EF improvement to >35% after isolated CABG in patients who had a preoperative EF ≤35%. We studied 375 patients who underwent CABG at a tertiary institution and had an echocardiogram preoperatively and postoperatively. Of these, 74 patients (20%) with a preoperative EF ≤35% were included in this analysis. Improvement in EF was defined as postoperative EF >35%. In the overall study population (n = 74), mean EF improved from 28 ± 6% preoperatively to 36 ± 12% postoperatively (p <0.0001). A total of 38 patients (51%) had postoperative improvement in EF to >35% (mean EF in these patients increased from 30 ± 5% to 46 ± 8%; p <0.0001). Patients with EF improvement had a higher preoperative EF than those with no improvement (30 ± 5% vs 26 ± 7%, p <0.005). Improvement in EF was 5 times more likely in patients with preoperative EF 26% to 35% (odds ratio 4.95, 95% CI 1.73 to 14.1; p = 0.003) than those with preoperative EF ≤25%. Other clinical characteristics were not significantly different between patients with versus without EF improvement. In conclusion, more than half of the ICD-eligible patients who underwent CABG improved their EF to >35% after surgery and became ineligible for a primary prevention ICD. EF improvement was unlikely in patients with preoperative EF <25%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959559816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84959559816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.029

DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.12.029

M3 - Article

C2 - 26803382

AN - SCOPUS:84959559816

VL - 117

SP - 957

EP - 960

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 6

ER -