Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography

Steven J. Michel; Perry J. Pickhardt; David H. Kim; Andrew J. Taylor

doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.03.006

Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography

Steven J. Michel
, Perry J. Pickhardt
, David H. Kim
, Andrew J. Taylor

Radiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of colonic distention in computed tomographic colonography (CTC). Methods: There were 3941 adults who underwent CTC with distention by either carbon dioxide (CO₂; n=2099) or room air (RA; n=l733). Supine distention and prone distention were prospectively assessed and compared. Results: With CO₂, distention on the supine view was superior in 72.1% (1514/2099) of the patients; with RA, the prone view was better in 56.8% (984/1733) (P<.0001). Conclusions: With CO₂, the supine data set is more often the superior view, whereas with RA, the prone data set is more often preferred.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	325-328
Number of pages	4
Journal	Clinical Imaging
Volume	31
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.03.006
State	Published - Sep 2007

Keywords

CT colonography
Colonic distention
Screening
Virtual colonoscopy

Publisher link

10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.03.006

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{5a3d54a3459644dcacc9ea68dcaea8a3,

title = "Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography",

abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of colonic distention in computed tomographic colonography (CTC). Methods: There were 3941 adults who underwent CTC with distention by either carbon dioxide (CO2; n=2099) or room air (RA; n=l733). Supine distention and prone distention were prospectively assessed and compared. Results: With CO2, distention on the supine view was superior in 72.1\% (1514/2099) of the patients; with RA, the prone view was better in 56.8\% (984/1733) (P<.0001). Conclusions: With CO2, the supine data set is more often the superior view, whereas with RA, the prone data set is more often preferred.",

keywords = "CT colonography, Colonic distention, Screening, Virtual colonoscopy",

author = "Michel, \{Steven J.\} and Pickhardt, \{Perry J.\} and Kim, \{David H.\} and Taylor, \{Andrew J.\}",

year = "2007",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.03.006",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "31",

pages = "325--328",

journal = "Clinical Imaging",

issn = "0899-7071",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography

AU - Michel, Steven J.

AU - Pickhardt, Perry J.

AU - Kim, David H.

AU - Taylor, Andrew J.

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of colonic distention in computed tomographic colonography (CTC). Methods: There were 3941 adults who underwent CTC with distention by either carbon dioxide (CO2; n=2099) or room air (RA; n=l733). Supine distention and prone distention were prospectively assessed and compared. Results: With CO2, distention on the supine view was superior in 72.1% (1514/2099) of the patients; with RA, the prone view was better in 56.8% (984/1733) (P<.0001). Conclusions: With CO2, the supine data set is more often the superior view, whereas with RA, the prone data set is more often preferred.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of colonic distention in computed tomographic colonography (CTC). Methods: There were 3941 adults who underwent CTC with distention by either carbon dioxide (CO2; n=2099) or room air (RA; n=l733). Supine distention and prone distention were prospectively assessed and compared. Results: With CO2, distention on the supine view was superior in 72.1% (1514/2099) of the patients; with RA, the prone view was better in 56.8% (984/1733) (P<.0001). Conclusions: With CO2, the supine data set is more often the superior view, whereas with RA, the prone data set is more often preferred.

KW - CT colonography

KW - Colonic distention

KW - Screening

KW - Virtual colonoscopy

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34548337177

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34548337177#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.03.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 17825740

AN - SCOPUS:34548337177

SN - 0899-7071

VL - 31

SP - 325

EP - 328

JO - Clinical Imaging

JF - Clinical Imaging

IS - 5

ER -

Effect of colonic distention on superiority of supine versus prone views in screening computed tomographic colonography

Abstract

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this