TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of bisphosphonate use on risk of postmenopausal breast cancer
T2 - Results from the randomized clinical trials of alendronate and zoledronic acid
AU - Hue, Trisha F.
AU - Cummings, Steven R.
AU - Cauley, Jane A.
AU - Bauer, Douglas C.
AU - Ensrud, Kristine E.
AU - Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
AU - Black, Dennis M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Importance: Studies have shown that bisphosphonatesmay have antitumor and antimetastatic properties. Recently, observational studies have suggested a possible protective effect of bisphosphonates on breast cancer, but the effect of bisphosphonate use on risk of breast cancer has not been tested in randomized trials.Objective: To assess the relationship of postmenopausal breast cancer incidence and bisphosphonate use using data from 2 randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.Design, Setting, and Participants: The Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) randomly assigned 6459 women aged 55 to 81 years to alendronate or placebo for a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) randomly assigned 7765 women aged 65 to 89 years to annual intravenous zoledronic acid or placebo for a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. Data were collected at clinical centers in the United States (FIT and HORIZON-PFT) and in Asia and the Pacific, Europe, North America, and South America (HORIZON-PFT).Women, in either study, with recurrent breast cancer or who reported a history of breast cancer were excluded from analyses. In each trial, a blinded review was conducted of each cancer adverse event report to verify incident invasive breast cancer cases. The primary analysis compared events in the active vs placebo group using a log-rank test.Intervention: Alendronate vs placebo (FIT) or zoledronic acid vs placebo (HORIZON-PFT).Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratio for incident breast cancer in the bisphosphonate treatment group compared to the placebo group.Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of breast cancer in FIT: 1.5%(n = 46) in the placebo group and 1.8%(n = 57) in the alendronate group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 0.84-1.83]). In HORIZON-PFT, there was also no significant difference: 0.8%(n = 29) in the placebo group and 0.9%(n = 33) in the zoledronic acid group (HR, 1.15 [95%CI, 0.70-1.89]). There was also no significant difference when the data from FIT and HORIZON-PFT were pooled (HR, 1.20 [95%CI, 0.89-1.63]).Conclusions and Relevance: These 2 randomized clinical trials do not support the findings from observational research. Contrary to the results from observational studies, we found that 3 to 4 years of bisphosphonate treatment did not decrease the risk of invasive postmenopausal breast cancer.
AB - Importance: Studies have shown that bisphosphonatesmay have antitumor and antimetastatic properties. Recently, observational studies have suggested a possible protective effect of bisphosphonates on breast cancer, but the effect of bisphosphonate use on risk of breast cancer has not been tested in randomized trials.Objective: To assess the relationship of postmenopausal breast cancer incidence and bisphosphonate use using data from 2 randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.Design, Setting, and Participants: The Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) randomly assigned 6459 women aged 55 to 81 years to alendronate or placebo for a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) randomly assigned 7765 women aged 65 to 89 years to annual intravenous zoledronic acid or placebo for a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. Data were collected at clinical centers in the United States (FIT and HORIZON-PFT) and in Asia and the Pacific, Europe, North America, and South America (HORIZON-PFT).Women, in either study, with recurrent breast cancer or who reported a history of breast cancer were excluded from analyses. In each trial, a blinded review was conducted of each cancer adverse event report to verify incident invasive breast cancer cases. The primary analysis compared events in the active vs placebo group using a log-rank test.Intervention: Alendronate vs placebo (FIT) or zoledronic acid vs placebo (HORIZON-PFT).Main Outcomes and Measures: Hazard ratio for incident breast cancer in the bisphosphonate treatment group compared to the placebo group.Results: There was no significant difference in the rate of breast cancer in FIT: 1.5%(n = 46) in the placebo group and 1.8%(n = 57) in the alendronate group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 0.84-1.83]). In HORIZON-PFT, there was also no significant difference: 0.8%(n = 29) in the placebo group and 0.9%(n = 33) in the zoledronic acid group (HR, 1.15 [95%CI, 0.70-1.89]). There was also no significant difference when the data from FIT and HORIZON-PFT were pooled (HR, 1.20 [95%CI, 0.89-1.63]).Conclusions and Relevance: These 2 randomized clinical trials do not support the findings from observational research. Contrary to the results from observational studies, we found that 3 to 4 years of bisphosphonate treatment did not decrease the risk of invasive postmenopausal breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84907963939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84907963939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3634
DO - 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3634
M3 - Article
C2 - 25111880
AN - SCOPUS:84907963939
SN - 2168-6106
VL - 174
SP - 1550
EP - 1557
JO - JAMA internal medicine
JF - JAMA internal medicine
IS - 10
ER -