Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes

Alan D. Steinman, Bradley J. Cardinale, Wayne R. Munns, Mary E. Ogdahl, J. David Allan, Ted Angadi, Sarah Bartlett, Kate A Brauman, Muruleedhara Byappanahalli, Matt Doss, Diane Dupont, Annie Johns, Donna Kashian, Frank Lupi, Peter McIntyre, Todd Miller, Michael Moore, Rebecca Logsdon Muenich, Rajendra Poudel, James PriceBill Provencher, Anne Rea, Jennifer Read, Steven Renzetti, Brent Sohngen, Erika Washburn

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

A comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services across the entire Great Lakes basin is currently lacking and is needed to make informed management decisions. A greater appreciation and understanding of ecosystem services, including both use and non-use services, may have avoided misguided resource management decisions in the past that resulted in negative legacies inherited by future generations. Given the interest in ecosystem services and lack of a coherent approach to addressing this topic in the Great Lakes, a summit was convened involving 28 experts working on various aspects of ecosystem services in the Great Lakes. The invited attendees spanned a variety of social and natural sciences. Given the unique status of the Great Lakes as the world's largest collective repository of surface freshwater, and the numerous stressors threatening this valuable resource, timing was propitious to examine ecosystem services. Several themes and recommendations emerged from the summit. There was general consensus that: 1) a comprehensive inventory of ecosystem services throughout the Great Lakes is a desirable goal but would require considerable resources; 2) more spatially and temporally intensive data are needed to overcome our data gaps, but the arrangement of data networks and observatories must be well-coordinated; 3) trade-offs must be considered as part of ecosystem services analyses; and 4) formation of a Great Lakes Institute for Ecosystem Services, to provide a hub for research, meetings, and training is desirable. Several challenges also emerged during the summit, which are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Great Lakes Research
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding and coordination for the working group Ecosystem Services in the Great Lakes was provided by the Cooperative Institute for Limnology and Ecosystems Research (CILER), which represents a Cooperative Agreement between NOAA and the University of Michigan (NA12OAR4320071). This is CILER contribution 1109. Constructive suggestions from two reviewers, as well as input from Rick Rediske (GVSU), are gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed in this article are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of any company, organization, or government agency. No official endorsement should be inferred.

Keywords

  • Ecosystem services
  • Laurentian Great Lakes
  • Use and non-use values

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ecosystem services in the Great Lakes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this