Ecosystem services altered by human changes in the nitrogen cycle: A new perspective for US decision making

Jana E. Compton, John A. Harrison, Robin L. Dennis, Tara L. Greaver, Brian H. Hill, Stephen J. Jordan, Henry Walker, Holly V. Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

181 Scopus citations


Ecology Letters (2011) 14: 804-815 Human alteration of the nitrogen (N) cycle has produced benefits for health and well-being, but excess N has altered many ecosystems and degraded air and water quality. US regulations mandate protection of the environment in terms that directly connect to ecosystem services. Here, we review the science quantifying effects of N on key ecosystem services, and compare the costs of N-related impacts or mitigation using the metric of cost per unit of N. Damage costs to the provision of clean air, reflected by impaired human respiratory health, are well characterized and fairly high (e.g. costs of ozone and particulate damages of $28 per kg NOx-N). Damage to services associated with productivity, biodiversity, recreation and clean water are less certain and although generally lower, these costs are quite variable (<$2.2-56 per kg N). In the current Chesapeake Bay restoration effort, for example, the collection of available damage costs clearly exceeds the projected abatement costs to reduce N loads to the Bay ($8-15 per kg N). Explicit consideration and accounting of effects on multiple ecosystem services provides decision-makers an integrated view of N sources, damages and abatement costs to address the significant challenges associated with reducing N pollution. Published 2011. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)804-815
Number of pages12
JournalEcology letters
Issue number8
StatePublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes


  • Air quality
  • Ecosystem services
  • Human health
  • Human well-being
  • Management
  • Nitrogen
  • Water quality


Dive into the research topics of 'Ecosystem services altered by human changes in the nitrogen cycle: A new perspective for US decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this