Economic comparison of liquid manure transport and land application

J. C. Hadrich, T. M. Harrigan, C. A. Wolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A spreadsheet-based manure transport and land application decision tool, MANURE$HAUL, was developed to provide farmers, customapplicators, and others involved with manure management a manure costand labor calculator for liquid manure systems using top-loading tankspreaders and nurse tanks. The manure hauling capacity was a function of the machinery set selected, manure tank capacity, and hauling distance. Manure transport and application costs were a function of spreadertank capacity and hauling distance. Representative 175-, 350-, 700-, and 1,400-cow dairy farms were compared to evaluate hauling time and machinery costs for a range of machinery sets, hauling distances,andnutrient values for the manure applied. Equipment ownership and operating costs were calculated for agitation, pumping, manure transport, land application, and incorporation. Equipment ownership and operating costs ranged from 0.32¢/L of manure hauled per year (1.18¢/gal) for a 175-cow dairy using a 11400-L (3000-gal) spreader with an average hauling distance of 1.6 km (1 mile) and broadcast application with tillage incorporation to 0.50¢/L (1.91¢/gal) fora 1400-cow farm with slurry injection and an average hauling distanceof 6.4 km (4 mile) with two 34100-L (9000-gal) spreaders and four nurse trucks for over-the-road transport. Two nurse trucks supplying a tractor-drawn spreader became more cost-effective than two tractor-drawn spreaders alone at a hauling distance of about 4.8 km (3 mile). Injection application increased the number of days needed for manure application compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation, but when the time for tillage incorporation was included the total time needed for field operations with injection was less than broadcast with incorporation. Manure injection increased application costsabout 6% compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation. When high soil phosphorus (P) levels restricted manure application rates to crop P removal rates, the credited nutrient value of the applied manure was reduced by 45%. The credited value of unincorporated manure with soil P constrained by crop removal was reduced by 60% compared to injected slurry with soil P at a build-up level. In each case the value of the manure nutrients applied exceeded the cost of agitation, pumping, transport, land application and incorporation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)743-758
Number of pages16
JournalApplied Engineering in Agriculture
Volume26
Issue number5
StatePublished - Nov 30 2010

Fingerprint

Manures
Economics
Liquids
Spreaders
Machinery
Dairies
Soils
Operating costs
Farms
Trucks
Nutrients
Crops
Costs
Tractors (truck)
Spreadsheets

Keywords

  • Economics
  • Land application
  • Machinery management
  • Manure management
  • Tank spreader

Cite this

Economic comparison of liquid manure transport and land application. / Hadrich, J. C.; Harrigan, T. M.; Wolf, C. A.

In: Applied Engineering in Agriculture, Vol. 26, No. 5, 30.11.2010, p. 743-758.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hadrich, J. C. ; Harrigan, T. M. ; Wolf, C. A. / Economic comparison of liquid manure transport and land application. In: Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 2010 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 743-758.
@article{7a2dac3ee9f34573bd6936115f31554c,
title = "Economic comparison of liquid manure transport and land application",
abstract = "A spreadsheet-based manure transport and land application decision tool, MANURE$HAUL, was developed to provide farmers, customapplicators, and others involved with manure management a manure costand labor calculator for liquid manure systems using top-loading tankspreaders and nurse tanks. The manure hauling capacity was a function of the machinery set selected, manure tank capacity, and hauling distance. Manure transport and application costs were a function of spreadertank capacity and hauling distance. Representative 175-, 350-, 700-, and 1,400-cow dairy farms were compared to evaluate hauling time and machinery costs for a range of machinery sets, hauling distances,andnutrient values for the manure applied. Equipment ownership and operating costs were calculated for agitation, pumping, manure transport, land application, and incorporation. Equipment ownership and operating costs ranged from 0.32¢/L of manure hauled per year (1.18¢/gal) for a 175-cow dairy using a 11400-L (3000-gal) spreader with an average hauling distance of 1.6 km (1 mile) and broadcast application with tillage incorporation to 0.50¢/L (1.91¢/gal) fora 1400-cow farm with slurry injection and an average hauling distanceof 6.4 km (4 mile) with two 34100-L (9000-gal) spreaders and four nurse trucks for over-the-road transport. Two nurse trucks supplying a tractor-drawn spreader became more cost-effective than two tractor-drawn spreaders alone at a hauling distance of about 4.8 km (3 mile). Injection application increased the number of days needed for manure application compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation, but when the time for tillage incorporation was included the total time needed for field operations with injection was less than broadcast with incorporation. Manure injection increased application costsabout 6{\%} compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation. When high soil phosphorus (P) levels restricted manure application rates to crop P removal rates, the credited nutrient value of the applied manure was reduced by 45{\%}. The credited value of unincorporated manure with soil P constrained by crop removal was reduced by 60{\%} compared to injected slurry with soil P at a build-up level. In each case the value of the manure nutrients applied exceeded the cost of agitation, pumping, transport, land application and incorporation.",
keywords = "Economics, Land application, Machinery management, Manure management, Tank spreader",
author = "Hadrich, {J. C.} and Harrigan, {T. M.} and Wolf, {C. A.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "30",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "743--758",
journal = "Applied Engineering in Agriculture",
issn = "0883-8542",
publisher = "American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic comparison of liquid manure transport and land application

AU - Hadrich, J. C.

AU - Harrigan, T. M.

AU - Wolf, C. A.

PY - 2010/11/30

Y1 - 2010/11/30

N2 - A spreadsheet-based manure transport and land application decision tool, MANURE$HAUL, was developed to provide farmers, customapplicators, and others involved with manure management a manure costand labor calculator for liquid manure systems using top-loading tankspreaders and nurse tanks. The manure hauling capacity was a function of the machinery set selected, manure tank capacity, and hauling distance. Manure transport and application costs were a function of spreadertank capacity and hauling distance. Representative 175-, 350-, 700-, and 1,400-cow dairy farms were compared to evaluate hauling time and machinery costs for a range of machinery sets, hauling distances,andnutrient values for the manure applied. Equipment ownership and operating costs were calculated for agitation, pumping, manure transport, land application, and incorporation. Equipment ownership and operating costs ranged from 0.32¢/L of manure hauled per year (1.18¢/gal) for a 175-cow dairy using a 11400-L (3000-gal) spreader with an average hauling distance of 1.6 km (1 mile) and broadcast application with tillage incorporation to 0.50¢/L (1.91¢/gal) fora 1400-cow farm with slurry injection and an average hauling distanceof 6.4 km (4 mile) with two 34100-L (9000-gal) spreaders and four nurse trucks for over-the-road transport. Two nurse trucks supplying a tractor-drawn spreader became more cost-effective than two tractor-drawn spreaders alone at a hauling distance of about 4.8 km (3 mile). Injection application increased the number of days needed for manure application compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation, but when the time for tillage incorporation was included the total time needed for field operations with injection was less than broadcast with incorporation. Manure injection increased application costsabout 6% compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation. When high soil phosphorus (P) levels restricted manure application rates to crop P removal rates, the credited nutrient value of the applied manure was reduced by 45%. The credited value of unincorporated manure with soil P constrained by crop removal was reduced by 60% compared to injected slurry with soil P at a build-up level. In each case the value of the manure nutrients applied exceeded the cost of agitation, pumping, transport, land application and incorporation.

AB - A spreadsheet-based manure transport and land application decision tool, MANURE$HAUL, was developed to provide farmers, customapplicators, and others involved with manure management a manure costand labor calculator for liquid manure systems using top-loading tankspreaders and nurse tanks. The manure hauling capacity was a function of the machinery set selected, manure tank capacity, and hauling distance. Manure transport and application costs were a function of spreadertank capacity and hauling distance. Representative 175-, 350-, 700-, and 1,400-cow dairy farms were compared to evaluate hauling time and machinery costs for a range of machinery sets, hauling distances,andnutrient values for the manure applied. Equipment ownership and operating costs were calculated for agitation, pumping, manure transport, land application, and incorporation. Equipment ownership and operating costs ranged from 0.32¢/L of manure hauled per year (1.18¢/gal) for a 175-cow dairy using a 11400-L (3000-gal) spreader with an average hauling distance of 1.6 km (1 mile) and broadcast application with tillage incorporation to 0.50¢/L (1.91¢/gal) fora 1400-cow farm with slurry injection and an average hauling distanceof 6.4 km (4 mile) with two 34100-L (9000-gal) spreaders and four nurse trucks for over-the-road transport. Two nurse trucks supplying a tractor-drawn spreader became more cost-effective than two tractor-drawn spreaders alone at a hauling distance of about 4.8 km (3 mile). Injection application increased the number of days needed for manure application compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation, but when the time for tillage incorporation was included the total time needed for field operations with injection was less than broadcast with incorporation. Manure injection increased application costsabout 6% compared to a broadcast application with tillage incorporation. When high soil phosphorus (P) levels restricted manure application rates to crop P removal rates, the credited nutrient value of the applied manure was reduced by 45%. The credited value of unincorporated manure with soil P constrained by crop removal was reduced by 60% compared to injected slurry with soil P at a build-up level. In each case the value of the manure nutrients applied exceeded the cost of agitation, pumping, transport, land application and incorporation.

KW - Economics

KW - Land application

KW - Machinery management

KW - Manure management

KW - Tank spreader

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649371824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649371824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 743

EP - 758

JO - Applied Engineering in Agriculture

JF - Applied Engineering in Agriculture

SN - 0883-8542

IS - 5

ER -