Economic and security regionalism among patrimonial authoritarian regimes: The case of Central Asia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Scopus citations

Abstract

The 'new regionalism' has spread to Central Asia; yet there has been little success in implementing most regional initiatives there. Security regionalism has had greater success than economic regionalism, even though economic initiatives would bring great benefits to the economy and population. I propose a connection between patrimonialism and regionalism. Central Asia's patrimonial leaders are driven by survival and personal enrichment, and are beholden to informal vested interests. Since economic regionalism involves liberalisation that adversely affects these actors, the result is 'virtual' economic regionalism at best. In the case of security regionalism, some regional organisations progress because they bolster patrimonial regimes, with negative consequences for democracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-281
Number of pages33
JournalEurope - Asia Studies
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Economic and security regionalism among patrimonial authoritarian regimes: The case of Central Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this