Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Press/Media
Datasets
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
EC-US agricultural trade relations: do political compromises exist?
L. P. Mahe, T. L. Roe
Applied Economics
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
1
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'EC-US agricultural trade relations: do political compromises exist?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Agricultural Trade
100%
Trade Relations
100%
Political Compromise
100%
Agricultural Reform
50%
Farm Programs
50%
Support Policies
50%
First Section
50%
Policy Objectives
50%
Social Groups
50%
Free Trade
50%
Economic Gain
50%
Value Function
50%
Production Level
50%
Complete Elimination
50%
Trade Disputes
50%
Common Agricultural Policy
50%
Price Support
50%
Uruguay Round
50%
Mutual Agreement
50%
Tariff Structure
50%
Welfare Efficiency
50%
Political Values
50%
Basic Positions
50%
Farm Support
50%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Agricultural Policy
100%
Welfare
50%
Free Trade
50%
WTO Negotiations
50%