Easier Said Than Done: Rejoinder on Sijtsma and on Green and Yang

Ernest C. Davenport, Mark L. Davison, Pey Yan Liou, Quintin U. Love

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The main points of Sijtsma and Green and Yang in Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice (34, 4) are that reliability, internal consistency, and unidimensionality are distinct and that Cronbach's alpha may be problematic. Neither of these assertions are at odds with Davenport, Davison, Liou, and Love in the same issue. However, many authors in the testing community mention these terms not only together, but sometimes as if they are synonymous. Moreover, Cronbach's coefficient alpha is very popular as an index of reliability. Thus, articles discussing alpha are not only appropriate, but necessary. Our concerns are the same as formed the genesis of prior (2009) articles by these same authors, Sijtsma and Green and Yang. This rejoinder also makes comments about item parcels when tests are multidimensional and about factor analytic approaches to assessing reliability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)6-10
Number of pages5
JournalEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Keywords

  • Cronbach's alpha
  • Dimensionality
  • Internal consistency
  • Reliability

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Easier Said Than Done: Rejoinder on Sijtsma and on Green and Yang'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this