Early experience with the stoploss jones tube

Laura Bagdonaite, Andrew R. Pearson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Extrusion is the most common reason for failure after Jones tube placement. The StopLoss Jones tube (SLJT) is a new innovation in Jones tubes that incorporates a flexible silicone internal flange to resist extrusion. We present our early experience of using this new tube and associated introducer system. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the case notes of a single surgeon consecutive series of patients having SLJT placement from November 2011 to November 2013. Results: 29 SLJTs were placed in 25 eyes of 19 patients. Tube follow-up ranged from 1-25 months (mean 10 months) with a total of 291 tube-months. The indications for SLJT placement were: previous LJT complications (52%), failed canalicular-DCR surgery (31%), primary placement for inoperable canalicular occlusion (14%) and patent non-functioning DCR (3%). Tube length ranged from 10-16mm. The tube introducer system was simple and effective and there were no intra-operative complications. The tube extrusion rate was 0%. Complications occurred in 5 tubes: 1 was too long, and 4 others (14%) developed conjunctival overgrowth/medial tube migration. Patient satisfaction with the tube was: 86% fully satisfied, 10% was moderately satisfied, 3% not satisfied. The overall final surgical success rate at last follow-up was 92%. Conclusions: In this short follow-up initial study the SLJT is simple to use and has a high rate of success and patient satisfaction. The addition of the internal silicone flange appears to prevent the previously common problem of extrusion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)132-136
Number of pages5
JournalOrbit
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Keywords

  • DCR
  • Jones lacrimal bypass tube
  • StopLoss Jones tube

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Early experience with the stoploss jones tube'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this