Dynamic motor control is associated with treatment outcomes for children with cerebral palsy

Michael H. Schwartz, Adam Rozumalski, Katherine M. Steele

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: To estimate the impact of dynamic motor control on treatment outcomes in children with cerebral palsy. Method: We used multiple regression on a retrospective cohort of 473 ambulatory children with cerebral palsy who underwent conservative treatment, single-level orthopaedic surgery, single-event multi-level orthopaedic surgery, or selective dorsal rhizotomy. Outcomes included gait pattern, gait speed, energy cost of walking, and the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument. Explanatory variables considered were pre-treatment levels of each outcome, treatment group, prior treatment, age, and dynamic motor control computed from surface electromyography using synergy analysis. Effect sizes were estimated from the adjusted response. Results: Pre-treatment levels had effect sizes 2 to 13 times larger than the next largest variable. Individuals with milder pre-treatment involvement had smaller gains or actual declines. Dynamic motor control was significant in all domains except energy cost. The effect size of dynamic motor control was second only to pre-treatment level, and was substantially larger than the effect size of treatment group for outcomes where both were significant (gait pattern 2:1, gait speed 4:1). The effect of dynamic motor control was independent of treatment group. Interpretation: Dynamic motor control is an important factor in treatment outcomes. Better dynamic motor control is associated with better outcomes, regardless of treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1139-1145
Number of pages7
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume58
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic motor control is associated with treatment outcomes for children with cerebral palsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this