TY - JOUR
T1 - Duration of progesterone-in-oil support after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer
T2 - A randomized, controlled trial
AU - Goudge, Christine S.
AU - Nagel, Theodore C.
AU - Damario, Mark A
PY - 2010/8
Y1 - 2010/8
N2 - Objective: To determine the efficacy of a short P-in-oil protocol (11 days) in comparison with a traditional P-in-oil protocol (6 weeks) after IVF and embryo transfer. Design: Prospective randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary referral reproductive medicine unit. Patient(s): The first IVF-embryo transfer cycle of women ≤37 years old. Intervention(s): Either the standard protocol, 50 mg of IM P-in-oil daily for 6 weeks (group 1) or the study protocol, 50 mg of IM P-in-oil daily for 11 days (group 2). Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates. Result(s): One hundred one patients were enrolled (48 in group 1, 53 in group 2). Mean age (31.8 years vs. 32.7 years) and reasons for infertility were not different between the groups. Despite higher embryo quality in group 1 than in group 2 (60.3 vs. 51.6), clinical (63.0% vs. 62.7%) and ongoing (58.7% vs. 51.0%) pregnancy rates (PR) were not significantly different. Live birth rates (52.2% vs. 49.0%) were not significantly different. Conclusion(s): Pregnancy and live birth rates were not different between the two groups, suggesting that the common practice of lengthy (≥6 weeks) P support of IVF pregnancies may be unnecessary.
AB - Objective: To determine the efficacy of a short P-in-oil protocol (11 days) in comparison with a traditional P-in-oil protocol (6 weeks) after IVF and embryo transfer. Design: Prospective randomized, controlled trial. Setting: Tertiary referral reproductive medicine unit. Patient(s): The first IVF-embryo transfer cycle of women ≤37 years old. Intervention(s): Either the standard protocol, 50 mg of IM P-in-oil daily for 6 weeks (group 1) or the study protocol, 50 mg of IM P-in-oil daily for 11 days (group 2). Main Outcome Measure(s): Clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates. Result(s): One hundred one patients were enrolled (48 in group 1, 53 in group 2). Mean age (31.8 years vs. 32.7 years) and reasons for infertility were not different between the groups. Despite higher embryo quality in group 1 than in group 2 (60.3 vs. 51.6), clinical (63.0% vs. 62.7%) and ongoing (58.7% vs. 51.0%) pregnancy rates (PR) were not significantly different. Live birth rates (52.2% vs. 49.0%) were not significantly different. Conclusion(s): Pregnancy and live birth rates were not different between the two groups, suggesting that the common practice of lengthy (≥6 weeks) P support of IVF pregnancies may be unnecessary.
KW - Luteal phase support
KW - in vitro fertilization
KW - pregnancy outcome
KW - progesterone-in-oil
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77955561484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77955561484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.003
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.003
M3 - Article
C2 - 19523613
AN - SCOPUS:77955561484
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 94
SP - 946
EP - 951
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 3
ER -