Dual conversations: Body talk among young women and their social contacts

Maureen O'Dougherty, Kathryn H. Schmitz, Mary O. Hearst, Michaela Covelli, Mindy S. Kurzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

In this article, we explore an area little researched within the literature on body dissatisfaction: the content and functions of body talk. We interviewed 60 diverse, college-educated women aged 18 to 30 in the urban United States about how social contacts talked about their bodies. Half the women, and by their reports, half their contacts (N = 295) endorsed some ideal body, most often the thin model. The other half favored a "healthy," "average" range in body size, shape, and/or appearance. Excepting family members, contacts gave mostly positive comments about women's bodies or appearance, or made no comments. Many critiqued their own bodies, however, as did nearly half the women participants. We suggest that these women exempted others, but not themselves, from critical body surveillance, rendering contestation of the ideal theoretical. We also suggest that the parallel airing of self-criticism repeatedly circulated through speech, if not through practice, the imperative to regulate one's own gendered body toward unattainable normativity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1204
Number of pages14
JournalQualitative Health Research
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2011

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article: Support was received from the National Cancer Institute’s Centers for Trans-disciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer (TREC; NCI Grant # U54CA116849 and 1R03CA150580-01).

Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • body image
  • culture
  • gender
  • women's health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Dual conversations: Body talk among young women and their social contacts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this