TY - JOUR
T1 - Drivers of shared decision making in inpatient psychiatry
T2 - An exploratory survey of patients' and multi-disciplinary team members' perspectives
AU - Cheung, Erick H.
AU - Petersen, Emily
AU - Zhang, Lily
AU - Wilkerson, Catherine
AU - Barceló, Nicolás E.
AU - Soderlund, Patricia D.
AU - Yerstein, Maria
AU - Wells, Kenneth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors
PY - 2022/11/1
Y1 - 2022/11/1
N2 - Objective: To assess the prevalence and predictors of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in an adult, inpatient psychiatric setting. Method: Multi-disciplinary clinician focus groups and patient pre-testing informed the development of a survey on 4 SDM and 11 factors hypothesized to interfere with SDM. The survey was administered to 89 adult inpatients (80% response rate) and their treatment team psychiatrists, nurses, and social workers (n = 338 ratings, 95% response rate). Group differences and predictors were estimated using t and F-tests. Results: Patients' mean SDM score (n = 64, standardized Cronbach alpha = 0.858) was 3.35 ± 1.13 (5 = highest agreement), and correlated with overall satisfaction with care (n = 61, r = 0.399, p = 0.001). Patients' disagreement with clinician's diagnosis (44% of patients) correlated with lower SDM ratings by patients (t = 2.55, df = 62, p = 0.013) and by clinicians (t = 2.99, df = 69, p = 0.004). Psychotic diagnoses were not a significant determining factor for SDM. Overall, clinicians rated SDM more favorably than patients (t = −5.43, df = 63, p < 0.001), with nurses and social workers rating SDM higher than physicians (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Diagnostic agreement / disagreement is a key predictor of SDM for patients and clinicians, while presence of psychosis is not. SDM was rated higher by clinicians than patients. SDM ratings vary significantly between clinical disciplines.
AB - Objective: To assess the prevalence and predictors of Shared Decision Making (SDM) in an adult, inpatient psychiatric setting. Method: Multi-disciplinary clinician focus groups and patient pre-testing informed the development of a survey on 4 SDM and 11 factors hypothesized to interfere with SDM. The survey was administered to 89 adult inpatients (80% response rate) and their treatment team psychiatrists, nurses, and social workers (n = 338 ratings, 95% response rate). Group differences and predictors were estimated using t and F-tests. Results: Patients' mean SDM score (n = 64, standardized Cronbach alpha = 0.858) was 3.35 ± 1.13 (5 = highest agreement), and correlated with overall satisfaction with care (n = 61, r = 0.399, p = 0.001). Patients' disagreement with clinician's diagnosis (44% of patients) correlated with lower SDM ratings by patients (t = 2.55, df = 62, p = 0.013) and by clinicians (t = 2.99, df = 69, p = 0.004). Psychotic diagnoses were not a significant determining factor for SDM. Overall, clinicians rated SDM more favorably than patients (t = −5.43, df = 63, p < 0.001), with nurses and social workers rating SDM higher than physicians (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Diagnostic agreement / disagreement is a key predictor of SDM for patients and clinicians, while presence of psychosis is not. SDM was rated higher by clinicians than patients. SDM ratings vary significantly between clinical disciplines.
KW - Decisional capacity
KW - Diagnostic agreement
KW - Inpatient psychiatry
KW - Patient Satisfaction
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Shared decision making
KW - Decision Making
KW - Humans
KW - Patient Participation
KW - Inpatients/psychology
KW - Decision Making, Shared
KW - Adult
KW - Psychiatry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138158515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138158515&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.08.004
DO - 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.08.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 36152457
AN - SCOPUS:85138158515
SN - 0163-8343
VL - 79
SP - 7
EP - 14
JO - General Hospital Psychiatry
JF - General Hospital Psychiatry
ER -