Drivers and barriers in public diplomacy evaluation: understanding attitudes, norms, and control

Alexander Buhmann, Erich J. Sommerfeldt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

While the need for evaluation has become increasingly emphasized within the global public diplomacy community, recent research suggests the state of the practice is grim. However, the few writings that exist on evaluation practices in public diplomacy are anecdotal and focus mainly on obstacles to enacting evaluation behavior. Little is known about evaluation-related perceptions, motivations, and attitudes of public diplomacy practitioners themselves. As practitioners are under increasing pressure to deliver evaluations, understanding the perspective of practitioners and their motivations is necessary. Drawing on the theory of planned behavior, this study presents the results of interviews with 25 public diplomacy practitioners in the U.S. Department of State. The results lend insight into the attitudes, norms, and behavioral controls that influence practitioners’ intentions to engage in evaluation. The article also suggests explanations as to why evaluation struggles to gain a foothold within public diplomacy, and makes proposals for improving future practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-125
Number of pages21
JournalInternational Communication Gazette
Volume83
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • U.S. Department of State
  • interviews
  • public diplomacy
  • theory of planned behavior

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drivers and barriers in public diplomacy evaluation: understanding attitudes, norms, and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this