Does the Mode of PROM Administration Affect the Responses of Hospitalized Patients?

David J. Weiss, Chun Wang, Jeffrey R. Basford, King Yiu Suen, Isabella M. Alvarado, Andrea Cheville

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a multidimensional computerized adaptive test, the Functional Assessment in Acute Care Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Test (FAMCAT), could be administered to hospitalized patients via a tablet computer rather than being orally administered by an interviewer. Design: A randomized comparison of the responses of hospitalized patients to interviewer vs tablet delivery of the FAMCAT and its assessment of applied cognition, daily activity, and basic mobility. Setting: Two quaternary teaching hospitals in the Upper Midwest. Participants: A total of 300 patients (127 men, 165 women), average age 61.2 (range, 18-97) hospitalized on medical services or rehospitalized on surgical services were randomly assigned to either a tablet (150) or an interview (150) group. Intervention: Electronic tablet vs interview. Main Outcome Measures: Item response theory point estimates of the FAMCAT latent scales, their psychometric standard errors, number of items administered per domain, the determinant (an indicator of overall precision of the latent trait vector), as well as the time that patients required to complete their FAMCAT sessions. Results: Of the 300 patients, 292 completed their assessments. The assessments of 4 individuals in each group was interrupted by clinical care and were not included in the analyses. A significant (P=.009) mode effect (ie, interview vs tablet) was identified when all outcome variables were considered simultaneously. However, the only outcome that was affected by the administration mode was test duration: tablet administration reduced the roughly 6-minute test time required by both approaches by only 20 seconds, which, though statistically significant, was clinically insignificant. Conclusions: The results of a FAMCAT assessment, at least for this cohort of hospitalized patients, are independent of administration via tablet computer or interview.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S59-S66.e3
JournalArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Volume103
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number R01HD079439 to the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine

Keywords

  • Activities of daily living
  • Cognitive function
  • Health care
  • Outcomes assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Computers, Handheld
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Psychometrics
  • Activities of Daily Living
  • Female
  • Cohort Studies
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does the Mode of PROM Administration Affect the Responses of Hospitalized Patients?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this