Abstract
Scale pervades interdisciplinary research on human-environment systems that exhibit hallmarks of complexity such as path dependence, nonlinearity, and surprise. Although scale concepts are woven through the data, methodology, and theory of human-environment research, the question remains: does scale exist? More broadly, can a single definition of scale suffice for human-environment systems? The meaning and use of scale is contested across the social, natural, and information sciences. Given that the study of human-environment systems spans many of these disciplines, specific research problems inherit a broad range of conflicting scale concepts. This paper proposes an epistemological scale continuum that arrays scale perspectives from the realist contention that there are natural scales independent of observers through to the constructionist view that scale is subjective and socially mediated. As seen in biocomplexity and human-environment research more broadly, this scale continuum establishes that scale is not a single measure or object of study, nor is any single definition of scale sufficient for human-environment systems. Viewpoints and tensions among scale epistemologies also suggest several general principles for using scale effectively in human-environment research.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 776-788 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Geoforum |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 1 2008 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Constructionism
- Global environmental change
- Realism
- Scale
Cite this
Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human-environment systems. / Manson, Steven M.
In: Geoforum, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.03.2008, p. 776-788.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does scale exist? An epistemological scale continuum for complex human-environment systems
AU - Manson, Steven M.
PY - 2008/3/1
Y1 - 2008/3/1
N2 - Scale pervades interdisciplinary research on human-environment systems that exhibit hallmarks of complexity such as path dependence, nonlinearity, and surprise. Although scale concepts are woven through the data, methodology, and theory of human-environment research, the question remains: does scale exist? More broadly, can a single definition of scale suffice for human-environment systems? The meaning and use of scale is contested across the social, natural, and information sciences. Given that the study of human-environment systems spans many of these disciplines, specific research problems inherit a broad range of conflicting scale concepts. This paper proposes an epistemological scale continuum that arrays scale perspectives from the realist contention that there are natural scales independent of observers through to the constructionist view that scale is subjective and socially mediated. As seen in biocomplexity and human-environment research more broadly, this scale continuum establishes that scale is not a single measure or object of study, nor is any single definition of scale sufficient for human-environment systems. Viewpoints and tensions among scale epistemologies also suggest several general principles for using scale effectively in human-environment research.
AB - Scale pervades interdisciplinary research on human-environment systems that exhibit hallmarks of complexity such as path dependence, nonlinearity, and surprise. Although scale concepts are woven through the data, methodology, and theory of human-environment research, the question remains: does scale exist? More broadly, can a single definition of scale suffice for human-environment systems? The meaning and use of scale is contested across the social, natural, and information sciences. Given that the study of human-environment systems spans many of these disciplines, specific research problems inherit a broad range of conflicting scale concepts. This paper proposes an epistemological scale continuum that arrays scale perspectives from the realist contention that there are natural scales independent of observers through to the constructionist view that scale is subjective and socially mediated. As seen in biocomplexity and human-environment research more broadly, this scale continuum establishes that scale is not a single measure or object of study, nor is any single definition of scale sufficient for human-environment systems. Viewpoints and tensions among scale epistemologies also suggest several general principles for using scale effectively in human-environment research.
KW - Constructionism
KW - Global environmental change
KW - Realism
KW - Scale
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39849092683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39849092683&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.010
DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:39849092683
VL - 39
SP - 776
EP - 788
JO - Geoforum
JF - Geoforum
SN - 0016-7185
IS - 2
ER -