Does Perfadex affect outcomes in clinical lung transplantation?

Dilip S. Nath, Adam R. Walter, Adam C. Johnson, David M. Radosevich, Mark E. Prekker, Cynthia S. Herrington, Peter S. Dahlberg, Rosemary F Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The use of a low-potassium-based preservation solution improves gas exchange in experimental models of lung transplantation. However, its efficacy in reducing the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and improving patient outcomes in the clinical setting is controversial. Methods: In this study we measured: oxygenation index (OI); International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) PGD grades; extubation times; intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay; 30-day, 90-day and 1-year survival rates; and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS)-free survival. We compared 115 consecutive (2001 to 2004) lung recipients who received allografts preserved with Perfadex, a low-potassium dextran (LPD) solution, and compared the results with the previous 116 consecutive (1999 to 2001) lung recipients who received allografts preserved with modified Euro-Collins (MEC) solution. Recipients were classified as having severe PGD (ISHLT Grade III) if the lowest arterial oxygenation (P) to fraction of inspired oxygen (F) (P/F ratio) within 48 hours post-transplantation was <200. Results: Baseline characteristics of the 2 cohorts were similar except for recipient age (LPD 53.5 vs MEC 49.9 years; p = 0.03). There were no differences in donor age, gender, category of transplant, indication for transplant, use of cardiopulmonary bypass or pre-operative pulmonary artery pressures. When gas-exchange parameters were measured upon arrival to the ICU (T0), at 24 hours post-transplant (T24) and at 48 hours post-transplant (T48), the only significant finding was that the incidence of ISHLT Grade III PGD at T24 was lower in the LPD group compared with the MEC group (8% vs 20%, p = 0.03). The incidence of severe PGD at other timepoints was not statistically different (LPD vs MEC: T0, 17% vs 26%; T0 to T48, 25% vs 31%). Both groups had similar extubation rates at 48 hours post-transplant (LPD 64% vs MEC 67%). The 30-day survival (LPD 93% vs MEC 95%), 90-day survival (LPD 89% vs MEC 89%), 1-year patient survival (LPD 80% vs MEC 77%) and 1-year BOS-free survival (LPD 70% vs MEC 74%) were not statistically different. Conclusions: Lung preservation with LPD as compared with MEC does not improve early gas exchange or impact 90-day and 1-year mortality. Continued investigation into lung preservation solution composition is necessary to reduce the incidence of PGD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2243-2248
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume24
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does Perfadex affect outcomes in clinical lung transplantation?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this