Does nasoenteral feeding afford adequate gastroduodenal stress prophylaxis?

Rawson J Valentine, W. W. Turner, K. R. Borman, J. A. Weigelt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations


Serial pH measurements were performed on 366 gastric aspirates from 20 critically ill patients receiving nasoenteral feeding with Osmolite or Isocal HCN, with no other means of gastric acid buffering. Ten patients (group A) received continuous intraduodenal feeding, and ten patients (group B) received continuous intragastric feeding. Gastric pH was at least 5.0 in 33 (23%) aspirates from group A, compared to 120 (54%) from group B (p < .001). Only two (20%) group A patients had gastric pH values of 5.0 or greater for at least half of the measurements, compared to six (60%) group B patients. These data indicate that continuous intragastric feeding with Osmolite or Isocal HCN controlled gastric pH better than did intraduodenal feeding. However, neither technique adequately neutralized gastric acidity in these critically ill patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)599-601
Number of pages3
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jan 1 1986
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Does nasoenteral feeding afford adequate gastroduodenal stress prophylaxis?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this