Does Group Deliberation Mobilize? The Effect of Public Deliberation on Willingness to Participate in Politics

C. Daniel Myers, Hunter G. Gordon, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Zachary Rowe, Susan Dorr Goold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations
72 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Proponents of public deliberation suggest that engaging in deliberation increases deliberators’ subsequent participation in other forms of politics. We evaluate this “deliberative participation hypothesis” using data drawn from a deliberative field experiment in which members of medically underserved communities in Michigan deliberated in small groups about the design of that state’s Medicaid program. Participants were randomly assigned to deliberate about the program in a group or to think about the decision individually, and then completed a post-survey that included measures of willingness to engage in a variety of political acts. We measured willingness to engage in common forms of political participation, as well as willingness to participate in particularistic resistance to adverse decisions by insurance bureaucracies. Contrary to the claims of much of the existing literature, we find no impact of deliberation on willingness to engage in political participation. These results suggest that the ability of public deliberation to increase broader political engagement may be limited or may only occur in particularly intensive, directly empowered forms of public deliberation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)557-580
Number of pages24
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume42
Issue number2
Early online dateOct 6 2018
DOIs
StateE-pub ahead of print - Oct 6 2018

Keywords

  • Deliberation
  • Health policy
  • Medicaid
  • Particularistic resistance
  • Political participation
  • Turnout

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Does Group Deliberation Mobilize? The Effect of Public Deliberation on Willingness to Participate in Politics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this