Does Faculty-Led Short-Term Study Abroad Improve Students’ Global Competence? Findings From a Systematic Review and Evidence Gap Map

Colleen Fisher, Laurel Iverson Hitchcock, Stacy Moak, Ashley Neyer, Sarah Moore, Scott E Marsalis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

As a high-impact pedagogical practice, study abroad is frequently utilized as an internationalization strategy to build post-secondary students’ global competence, but the impact of faculty-led short-term study abroad may vary widely across outcomes of interest. An understanding of student learning outcomes is especially needed now as COVID-19 begins to shift from pandemic to endemic and universities restart international initiatives. This systematic review synthesized and mapped evidence on global competence outcomes of short-term study abroad for undergraduate and graduate students. Studies (n=92) reported a total of 215 outcomes representing the three global competence domains of knowledge (41.4% of all outcomes), attitudes (38.1%), and skills (20.5%). Data sources used to assess global competence outcomes included self-administered surveys (40.1% of assessments), student journals (24.9%), and qualitative interviews (13.6%). While findings from this sample of studies offer evidence of positive impact of short-term study abroad on students’ global competence, the substantive and methodological evidence gaps identified can help to build conceptual clarity and guide design of future assessment approaches.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)417
Number of pages452
JournalFrontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 10 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does Faculty-Led Short-Term Study Abroad Improve Students’ Global Competence? Findings From a Systematic Review and Evidence Gap Map'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this