Projects per year
Abstract
As a high-impact pedagogical practice, study abroad is frequently utilized as an internationalization strategy to build post-secondary students’ global competence, but the impact of faculty-led short-term study abroad may vary widely across outcomes of interest. An understanding of student learning outcomes is especially needed now as COVID-19 begins to shift from pandemic to endemic and universities restart international initiatives. This systematic review synthesized and mapped evidence on global competence outcomes of short-term study abroad for undergraduate and graduate students. Studies (n=92) reported a total of 215 outcomes representing the three global competence domains of knowledge (41.4% of all outcomes), attitudes (38.1%), and skills (20.5%). Data sources used to assess global competence outcomes included self-administered surveys (40.1% of assessments), student journals (24.9%), and qualitative interviews (13.6%). While findings from this sample of studies offer evidence of positive impact of short-term study abroad on students’ global competence, the substantive and methodological evidence gaps identified can help to build conceptual clarity and guide design of future assessment approaches.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 417 |
Number of pages | 452 |
Journal | Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 10 2023 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does Faculty-Led Short-Term Study Abroad Improve Students’ Global Competence? Findings From a Systematic Review and Evidence Gap Map'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Active
-
Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis Service
Kocher, M. M. (Leader), Riegelman, A. L. (Leader) & Theis-Mahon, N. (Leader)
1/1/18 → …
Project: Other project