TY - JOUR
T1 - Does consumer irrationality trump consumer sovereignty?
AU - Waldfogel, Joel
PY - 2005/11
Y1 - 2005/11
N2 - Scholars working on the border of economics and psychology have documented many contexts in which individual decision-making is unreliable and might be improved by paternalistic interventions. Against this mounting body of negative evidence, economists' default belief in consumer sovereignty has been motivated primarily by theory rather than evidence. The goal of the present study is to see whether there is direct evidence supporting economists' faith in consumer sovereignty in a simple context. We address this question by presenting direct evidence that consumers' own purchases generate between 10% and 18% more value, per dollar spent, than items received as gifts.
AB - Scholars working on the border of economics and psychology have documented many contexts in which individual decision-making is unreliable and might be improved by paternalistic interventions. Against this mounting body of negative evidence, economists' default belief in consumer sovereignty has been motivated primarily by theory rather than evidence. The goal of the present study is to see whether there is direct evidence supporting economists' faith in consumer sovereignty in a simple context. We address this question by presenting direct evidence that consumers' own purchases generate between 10% and 18% more value, per dollar spent, than items received as gifts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31544453873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31544453873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/003465305775098107
DO - 10.1162/003465305775098107
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:31544453873
SN - 0034-6535
VL - 87
SP - 691
EP - 696
JO - Review of Economics and Statistics
JF - Review of Economics and Statistics
IS - 4
ER -