Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline?

Mary E Butler, Ellen McCreedy, Torie Nelson, Priyanka Desai, Edward Ratner, Howard A Fink, Laura S Hemmy, John R McCarten, Terry R. Barclay, Michelle Brasure, Heather W Davila, Robert L. Kane

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Structured activities to stimulate brain function—that is, cognitive training exercises—are promoted to slow or prevent cognitive decline, including dementia, but their effectiveness is highly debated. Purpose: To summarize evidence on the effects of cognitive training on cognitive performance and incident dementia outcomes for adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through July 2017, supplemented by hand-searches. Study Selection: Trials (published in English) lasting at least 6 months that compared cognitive training with usual care, waitlist, information, or attention controls in adults without dementia. Data Extraction: Single-reviewer extraction of study characteristics confirmed by a second reviewer; dual-reviewer risk-of-bias assessment; consensus determination of strength of evidence. Only studies with low or medium risk of bias were analyzed. Data Synthesis: Of 11 trials with low or medium risk of bias, 6 enrolled healthy adults with normal cognition and 5 enrolled adults with MCI. Trainings for healthy older adults were mostly computer based; those for adults with MCI were mostly held in group sessions. The MCI trials used attention controls more often than trials with healthy populations. For healthy older adults, training improved cognitive performance in the domain trained but not in other domains (moderate-strength evidence). Results for populations with MCI suggested no effect of training on performance (low-strength and insufficient evidence). Evidence for prevention of cognitive decline or dementia was insufficient. Adverse events were not reported. Limitation: Heterogeneous interventions and outcome measures; outcomes that mostly assessed test performance rather than global function or dementia diagnosis; potential publication bias. Conclusion: In older adults with normal cognition, training improves cognitive performance in the domain trained. Evidence regarding prevention or delay of cognitive decline or dementia is insufficient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-68
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of internal medicine
Volume168
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2018

Fingerprint

Dementia
Cognition
Publication Bias
Cognitive Dysfunction
Information Storage and Retrieval
MEDLINE
Population
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Brain

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Systematic Review
  • Video-Audio Media

Cite this

Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline? / Butler, Mary E; McCreedy, Ellen; Nelson, Torie; Desai, Priyanka; Ratner, Edward; Fink, Howard A; Hemmy, Laura S; McCarten, John R; Barclay, Terry R.; Brasure, Michelle; Davila, Heather W; Kane, Robert L.

In: Annals of internal medicine, Vol. 168, No. 1, 02.01.2018, p. 63-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Butler, Mary E ; McCreedy, Ellen ; Nelson, Torie ; Desai, Priyanka ; Ratner, Edward ; Fink, Howard A ; Hemmy, Laura S ; McCarten, John R ; Barclay, Terry R. ; Brasure, Michelle ; Davila, Heather W ; Kane, Robert L. / Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline?. In: Annals of internal medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 168, No. 1. pp. 63-68.
@article{f4d38d10111641bb975a35e4348c46fb,
title = "Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline?",
abstract = "Background: Structured activities to stimulate brain function—that is, cognitive training exercises—are promoted to slow or prevent cognitive decline, including dementia, but their effectiveness is highly debated. Purpose: To summarize evidence on the effects of cognitive training on cognitive performance and incident dementia outcomes for adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through July 2017, supplemented by hand-searches. Study Selection: Trials (published in English) lasting at least 6 months that compared cognitive training with usual care, waitlist, information, or attention controls in adults without dementia. Data Extraction: Single-reviewer extraction of study characteristics confirmed by a second reviewer; dual-reviewer risk-of-bias assessment; consensus determination of strength of evidence. Only studies with low or medium risk of bias were analyzed. Data Synthesis: Of 11 trials with low or medium risk of bias, 6 enrolled healthy adults with normal cognition and 5 enrolled adults with MCI. Trainings for healthy older adults were mostly computer based; those for adults with MCI were mostly held in group sessions. The MCI trials used attention controls more often than trials with healthy populations. For healthy older adults, training improved cognitive performance in the domain trained but not in other domains (moderate-strength evidence). Results for populations with MCI suggested no effect of training on performance (low-strength and insufficient evidence). Evidence for prevention of cognitive decline or dementia was insufficient. Adverse events were not reported. Limitation: Heterogeneous interventions and outcome measures; outcomes that mostly assessed test performance rather than global function or dementia diagnosis; potential publication bias. Conclusion: In older adults with normal cognition, training improves cognitive performance in the domain trained. Evidence regarding prevention or delay of cognitive decline or dementia is insufficient.",
author = "Butler, {Mary E} and Ellen McCreedy and Torie Nelson and Priyanka Desai and Edward Ratner and Fink, {Howard A} and Hemmy, {Laura S} and McCarten, {John R} and Barclay, {Terry R.} and Michelle Brasure and Davila, {Heather W} and Kane, {Robert L.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.7326/M17-1531",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "168",
pages = "63--68",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline?

AU - Butler, Mary E

AU - McCreedy, Ellen

AU - Nelson, Torie

AU - Desai, Priyanka

AU - Ratner, Edward

AU - Fink, Howard A

AU - Hemmy, Laura S

AU - McCarten, John R

AU - Barclay, Terry R.

AU - Brasure, Michelle

AU - Davila, Heather W

AU - Kane, Robert L.

PY - 2018/1/2

Y1 - 2018/1/2

N2 - Background: Structured activities to stimulate brain function—that is, cognitive training exercises—are promoted to slow or prevent cognitive decline, including dementia, but their effectiveness is highly debated. Purpose: To summarize evidence on the effects of cognitive training on cognitive performance and incident dementia outcomes for adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through July 2017, supplemented by hand-searches. Study Selection: Trials (published in English) lasting at least 6 months that compared cognitive training with usual care, waitlist, information, or attention controls in adults without dementia. Data Extraction: Single-reviewer extraction of study characteristics confirmed by a second reviewer; dual-reviewer risk-of-bias assessment; consensus determination of strength of evidence. Only studies with low or medium risk of bias were analyzed. Data Synthesis: Of 11 trials with low or medium risk of bias, 6 enrolled healthy adults with normal cognition and 5 enrolled adults with MCI. Trainings for healthy older adults were mostly computer based; those for adults with MCI were mostly held in group sessions. The MCI trials used attention controls more often than trials with healthy populations. For healthy older adults, training improved cognitive performance in the domain trained but not in other domains (moderate-strength evidence). Results for populations with MCI suggested no effect of training on performance (low-strength and insufficient evidence). Evidence for prevention of cognitive decline or dementia was insufficient. Adverse events were not reported. Limitation: Heterogeneous interventions and outcome measures; outcomes that mostly assessed test performance rather than global function or dementia diagnosis; potential publication bias. Conclusion: In older adults with normal cognition, training improves cognitive performance in the domain trained. Evidence regarding prevention or delay of cognitive decline or dementia is insufficient.

AB - Background: Structured activities to stimulate brain function—that is, cognitive training exercises—are promoted to slow or prevent cognitive decline, including dementia, but their effectiveness is highly debated. Purpose: To summarize evidence on the effects of cognitive training on cognitive performance and incident dementia outcomes for adults with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO through July 2017, supplemented by hand-searches. Study Selection: Trials (published in English) lasting at least 6 months that compared cognitive training with usual care, waitlist, information, or attention controls in adults without dementia. Data Extraction: Single-reviewer extraction of study characteristics confirmed by a second reviewer; dual-reviewer risk-of-bias assessment; consensus determination of strength of evidence. Only studies with low or medium risk of bias were analyzed. Data Synthesis: Of 11 trials with low or medium risk of bias, 6 enrolled healthy adults with normal cognition and 5 enrolled adults with MCI. Trainings for healthy older adults were mostly computer based; those for adults with MCI were mostly held in group sessions. The MCI trials used attention controls more often than trials with healthy populations. For healthy older adults, training improved cognitive performance in the domain trained but not in other domains (moderate-strength evidence). Results for populations with MCI suggested no effect of training on performance (low-strength and insufficient evidence). Evidence for prevention of cognitive decline or dementia was insufficient. Adverse events were not reported. Limitation: Heterogeneous interventions and outcome measures; outcomes that mostly assessed test performance rather than global function or dementia diagnosis; potential publication bias. Conclusion: In older adults with normal cognition, training improves cognitive performance in the domain trained. Evidence regarding prevention or delay of cognitive decline or dementia is insufficient.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039931387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039931387&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/M17-1531

DO - 10.7326/M17-1531

M3 - Review article

VL - 168

SP - 63

EP - 68

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 1

ER -