Does AMBER Alert ‘save lives’? An empirical analysis and critical implications

Timothy Griffin, Joshua H. Williams, John Wooldredge, Danielle Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

A sample of 448 child abduction cases in which America's Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response (AMBER) Alert was issued was examined to determine the extent to which AMBER Alert is successful in rescuing abducted children, and whether the successes suggest ‘lifesaving’ rescues. We reached conclusions consistent with the scant available prior research on AMBER Alert: although over 25% of the Alerts facilitated the recovery of abducted child(ren) and are thus arguably ‘successful’ by that standard alone, there was little evidence AMBER Alerts ‘save lives.’ In fact, AMBER Alert success cases are in almost every measurable way identical to AMBER Alert cases in which the child(ren) were returned unharmed but the Alert had no direct role in that outcome: they typically involve abduction by family members and other (apparently) non-life-threatening abductors, and the vast majority of recovery times are over 3 h. The implications for the public discourse regarding AMBER Alert and directions for future research are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)490-511
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Crime and Justice
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Midwestern Criminal Justice Association.

Keywords

  • America's Missing: Broadcast Emergency Response Alert
  • child abduction
  • familial abduction

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does AMBER Alert ‘save lives’? An empirical analysis and critical implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this