Do Physicists Have Geography Envy? And What Can Geographers Learn from It?

David O’Sullivan, Steven M. Manson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent years have seen an increasing amount of work by physicists on topics outside their traditional research domain, including geography. We explore the scope of this development, place it in a historical context dating back at least to statistical physics in the nineteenth century and trace the origins of more recent developments to the roots of computational science after World War II. Our primary purpose is not historical, however. Instead, we are concerned with understanding what geographers can learn from the many recent contributions by physicists to understanding spatiotemporal systems. Drawing on examples of work in this tradition by physicists, we argue that two apparently different modes of investigation are common: model-driven and data-driven approaches. The former is associated with complexity science, whereas the latter is more commonly associated with the fourth paradigm, more recently known as “big data.” Both modes share technical strengths and, more important, a capacity for generalization, which is absent from much work in geography. We argue that although some of this research lacks an appreciation of previous geographical contributions, when assessed critically, it nevertheless brings useful new perspectives, new methods, and new ideas to bear on topics central to geography, yet neglected in the discipline. We conclude with some suggestions for how geographers can build on these new approaches, both inside and outside the discipline.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)704-722
Number of pages19
JournalAnnals of the Association of American Geographers
Volume105
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2015

Fingerprint

envy
geography
science
nineteenth century
World War II
physics
paradigm
lack

Keywords

  • big data
  • complexity
  • computational science
  • cybernetics
  • fourth paradigm
  • geographical thought
  • quantification
  • social physics
  • systems theory

Cite this

Do Physicists Have Geography Envy? And What Can Geographers Learn from It? / O’Sullivan, David; Manson, Steven M.

In: Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 105, No. 4, 04.07.2015, p. 704-722.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{205bb3086c874b0d9d7cc6f7bda6a7ed,
title = "Do Physicists Have Geography Envy? And What Can Geographers Learn from It?",
abstract = "Recent years have seen an increasing amount of work by physicists on topics outside their traditional research domain, including geography. We explore the scope of this development, place it in a historical context dating back at least to statistical physics in the nineteenth century and trace the origins of more recent developments to the roots of computational science after World War II. Our primary purpose is not historical, however. Instead, we are concerned with understanding what geographers can learn from the many recent contributions by physicists to understanding spatiotemporal systems. Drawing on examples of work in this tradition by physicists, we argue that two apparently different modes of investigation are common: model-driven and data-driven approaches. The former is associated with complexity science, whereas the latter is more commonly associated with the fourth paradigm, more recently known as “big data.” Both modes share technical strengths and, more important, a capacity for generalization, which is absent from much work in geography. We argue that although some of this research lacks an appreciation of previous geographical contributions, when assessed critically, it nevertheless brings useful new perspectives, new methods, and new ideas to bear on topics central to geography, yet neglected in the discipline. We conclude with some suggestions for how geographers can build on these new approaches, both inside and outside the discipline.",
keywords = "big data, complexity, computational science, cybernetics, fourth paradigm, geographical thought, quantification, social physics, systems theory",
author = "David O’Sullivan and Manson, {Steven M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "105",
pages = "704--722",
journal = "Annals of the American Association of Geographers",
issn = "2469-4452",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do Physicists Have Geography Envy? And What Can Geographers Learn from It?

AU - O’Sullivan, David

AU - Manson, Steven M.

PY - 2015/7/4

Y1 - 2015/7/4

N2 - Recent years have seen an increasing amount of work by physicists on topics outside their traditional research domain, including geography. We explore the scope of this development, place it in a historical context dating back at least to statistical physics in the nineteenth century and trace the origins of more recent developments to the roots of computational science after World War II. Our primary purpose is not historical, however. Instead, we are concerned with understanding what geographers can learn from the many recent contributions by physicists to understanding spatiotemporal systems. Drawing on examples of work in this tradition by physicists, we argue that two apparently different modes of investigation are common: model-driven and data-driven approaches. The former is associated with complexity science, whereas the latter is more commonly associated with the fourth paradigm, more recently known as “big data.” Both modes share technical strengths and, more important, a capacity for generalization, which is absent from much work in geography. We argue that although some of this research lacks an appreciation of previous geographical contributions, when assessed critically, it nevertheless brings useful new perspectives, new methods, and new ideas to bear on topics central to geography, yet neglected in the discipline. We conclude with some suggestions for how geographers can build on these new approaches, both inside and outside the discipline.

AB - Recent years have seen an increasing amount of work by physicists on topics outside their traditional research domain, including geography. We explore the scope of this development, place it in a historical context dating back at least to statistical physics in the nineteenth century and trace the origins of more recent developments to the roots of computational science after World War II. Our primary purpose is not historical, however. Instead, we are concerned with understanding what geographers can learn from the many recent contributions by physicists to understanding spatiotemporal systems. Drawing on examples of work in this tradition by physicists, we argue that two apparently different modes of investigation are common: model-driven and data-driven approaches. The former is associated with complexity science, whereas the latter is more commonly associated with the fourth paradigm, more recently known as “big data.” Both modes share technical strengths and, more important, a capacity for generalization, which is absent from much work in geography. We argue that although some of this research lacks an appreciation of previous geographical contributions, when assessed critically, it nevertheless brings useful new perspectives, new methods, and new ideas to bear on topics central to geography, yet neglected in the discipline. We conclude with some suggestions for how geographers can build on these new approaches, both inside and outside the discipline.

KW - big data

KW - complexity

KW - computational science

KW - cybernetics

KW - fourth paradigm

KW - geographical thought

KW - quantification

KW - social physics

KW - systems theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937813772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937813772&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105

DO - 10.1080/00045608.2015.1039105

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937813772

VL - 105

SP - 704

EP - 722

JO - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

JF - Annals of the American Association of Geographers

SN - 2469-4452

IS - 4

ER -