Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement

Terrie E. Moffitt, Avshalom Caspi, Robert F. Krueger, Lynn Magdol, Gayla Margolin, Phil A. Silva, Ros Sydney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

251 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study tested whether partners can be relied on to provide congruent reports about abuse in their relationship. The authors examined whether interpartner agreement (IA) varies as a function of whether the perpetrator is the man or the woman, and by whether the abusive behavior being reported is physical or psychological. Guided by psychometric test theory, the authors examined whether weak 14 about specific behaviors can be improved by aggregating behavior items into scales and by controlling for random measurement error. A representative sample of 360 young couples was studied. IA did not vary with the perpetrator's gender or with the nature of the abusive behaviors, but victims (both men and women) reported somewhat more abuse than did their perpetrators. IA about specific abusive behaviors was only poor to fair, but it became very good when items were aggregated into scales and even better when measurement errors were removed from the reports. The findings suggest that reports of abuse can be aggregated to form internally consistent scales that show strong IA, thereby fulfilling criteria for reliability. Moreover under research conditions that guarantee confidentiality, either abuser reports or victim reports are suitable methods for use in research on partner abuse.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)47-56
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological assessment
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1997

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Spouse Abuse
Confidentiality
Research
Psychology

Cite this

Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. / Moffitt, Terrie E.; Caspi, Avshalom; Krueger, Robert F.; Magdol, Lynn; Margolin, Gayla; Silva, Phil A.; Sydney, Ros.

In: Psychological assessment, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.03.1997, p. 47-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moffitt, Terrie E. ; Caspi, Avshalom ; Krueger, Robert F. ; Magdol, Lynn ; Margolin, Gayla ; Silva, Phil A. ; Sydney, Ros. / Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement. In: Psychological assessment. 1997 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 47-56.
@article{4695b18f791344f7801f7d6521b02922,
title = "Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement",
abstract = "This study tested whether partners can be relied on to provide congruent reports about abuse in their relationship. The authors examined whether interpartner agreement (IA) varies as a function of whether the perpetrator is the man or the woman, and by whether the abusive behavior being reported is physical or psychological. Guided by psychometric test theory, the authors examined whether weak 14 about specific behaviors can be improved by aggregating behavior items into scales and by controlling for random measurement error. A representative sample of 360 young couples was studied. IA did not vary with the perpetrator's gender or with the nature of the abusive behaviors, but victims (both men and women) reported somewhat more abuse than did their perpetrators. IA about specific abusive behaviors was only poor to fair, but it became very good when items were aggregated into scales and even better when measurement errors were removed from the reports. The findings suggest that reports of abuse can be aggregated to form internally consistent scales that show strong IA, thereby fulfilling criteria for reliability. Moreover under research conditions that guarantee confidentiality, either abuser reports or victim reports are suitable methods for use in research on partner abuse.",
author = "Moffitt, {Terrie E.} and Avshalom Caspi and Krueger, {Robert F.} and Lynn Magdol and Gayla Margolin and Silva, {Phil A.} and Ros Sydney",
year = "1997",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.47",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "47--56",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do partners agree about abuse in their relationship? A psychometric evaluation of interpartner agreement

AU - Moffitt, Terrie E.

AU - Caspi, Avshalom

AU - Krueger, Robert F.

AU - Magdol, Lynn

AU - Margolin, Gayla

AU - Silva, Phil A.

AU - Sydney, Ros

PY - 1997/3/1

Y1 - 1997/3/1

N2 - This study tested whether partners can be relied on to provide congruent reports about abuse in their relationship. The authors examined whether interpartner agreement (IA) varies as a function of whether the perpetrator is the man or the woman, and by whether the abusive behavior being reported is physical or psychological. Guided by psychometric test theory, the authors examined whether weak 14 about specific behaviors can be improved by aggregating behavior items into scales and by controlling for random measurement error. A representative sample of 360 young couples was studied. IA did not vary with the perpetrator's gender or with the nature of the abusive behaviors, but victims (both men and women) reported somewhat more abuse than did their perpetrators. IA about specific abusive behaviors was only poor to fair, but it became very good when items were aggregated into scales and even better when measurement errors were removed from the reports. The findings suggest that reports of abuse can be aggregated to form internally consistent scales that show strong IA, thereby fulfilling criteria for reliability. Moreover under research conditions that guarantee confidentiality, either abuser reports or victim reports are suitable methods for use in research on partner abuse.

AB - This study tested whether partners can be relied on to provide congruent reports about abuse in their relationship. The authors examined whether interpartner agreement (IA) varies as a function of whether the perpetrator is the man or the woman, and by whether the abusive behavior being reported is physical or psychological. Guided by psychometric test theory, the authors examined whether weak 14 about specific behaviors can be improved by aggregating behavior items into scales and by controlling for random measurement error. A representative sample of 360 young couples was studied. IA did not vary with the perpetrator's gender or with the nature of the abusive behaviors, but victims (both men and women) reported somewhat more abuse than did their perpetrators. IA about specific abusive behaviors was only poor to fair, but it became very good when items were aggregated into scales and even better when measurement errors were removed from the reports. The findings suggest that reports of abuse can be aggregated to form internally consistent scales that show strong IA, thereby fulfilling criteria for reliability. Moreover under research conditions that guarantee confidentiality, either abuser reports or victim reports are suitable methods for use in research on partner abuse.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030989510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030989510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.47

DO - 10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.47

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030989510

VL - 9

SP - 47

EP - 56

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 1

ER -