Do GIS-derived measures of fast food retailers convey perceived fast food opportunities? Implications for food environment assessment

Timothy L. Barnes, Natalie Colabianchi, Darcy A. Freedman, Bethany A. Bell, Angela D. Liese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose Geographic information systems (GISs) have been used to define fast food availability, with higher availability perhaps promoting poorer quality diets. Alternative measures involve perceptions; however, few studies have examined associations between GIS-derived and perceived measures of the food environment. Methods Telephone surveys of 705 participants within an eight-county region in South Carolina were analyzed using logistic regression to examine relationships between geographic presence of and distance to various types of food retailers and perceived fast food availability. Results The mean distance to the nearest fast food restaurant was 6.1 miles, with 16% of participants having a fast food restaurant within 1 mile of home. The geographic presence of and distance to all food retailer types were significantly associated with perceived availability of fast food in unadjusted models. After adjustment, only the presence of a fast food restaurant or pharmacy was significantly associated with greater odds of higher perceived availability of fast food. Greater odds of lower perceived availability of fast food were observed with the presence of a dollar store and increasing distance to the nearest supermarket or pharmacy. Conclusions Measures of fast food availability, whether objective or perceived, may not be interchangeable. Researchers should carefully decide on the appropriate measurement tool—GIS-derived or perceived—in food environment studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-34
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of epidemiology
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Fast Foods
Geographic Information Systems
Food
Restaurants
Telephone
Logistic Models
Research Personnel
Diet

Keywords

  • Fast food
  • Food retailers
  • Geographic
  • GIS
  • Perception
  • Survey

Cite this

Do GIS-derived measures of fast food retailers convey perceived fast food opportunities? Implications for food environment assessment. / Barnes, Timothy L.; Colabianchi, Natalie; Freedman, Darcy A.; Bell, Bethany A.; Liese, Angela D.

In: Annals of epidemiology, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 27-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barnes, Timothy L. ; Colabianchi, Natalie ; Freedman, Darcy A. ; Bell, Bethany A. ; Liese, Angela D. / Do GIS-derived measures of fast food retailers convey perceived fast food opportunities? Implications for food environment assessment. In: Annals of epidemiology. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 27-34.
@article{2142ac8ee4194f7898658d3318079513,
title = "Do GIS-derived measures of fast food retailers convey perceived fast food opportunities? Implications for food environment assessment",
abstract = "Purpose Geographic information systems (GISs) have been used to define fast food availability, with higher availability perhaps promoting poorer quality diets. Alternative measures involve perceptions; however, few studies have examined associations between GIS-derived and perceived measures of the food environment. Methods Telephone surveys of 705 participants within an eight-county region in South Carolina were analyzed using logistic regression to examine relationships between geographic presence of and distance to various types of food retailers and perceived fast food availability. Results The mean distance to the nearest fast food restaurant was 6.1 miles, with 16{\%} of participants having a fast food restaurant within 1 mile of home. The geographic presence of and distance to all food retailer types were significantly associated with perceived availability of fast food in unadjusted models. After adjustment, only the presence of a fast food restaurant or pharmacy was significantly associated with greater odds of higher perceived availability of fast food. Greater odds of lower perceived availability of fast food were observed with the presence of a dollar store and increasing distance to the nearest supermarket or pharmacy. Conclusions Measures of fast food availability, whether objective or perceived, may not be interchangeable. Researchers should carefully decide on the appropriate measurement tool—GIS-derived or perceived—in food environment studies.",
keywords = "Fast food, Food retailers, Geographic, GIS, Perception, Survey",
author = "Barnes, {Timothy L.} and Natalie Colabianchi and Freedman, {Darcy A.} and Bell, {Bethany A.} and Liese, {Angela D.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.08.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "27--34",
journal = "Annals of Epidemiology",
issn = "1047-2797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do GIS-derived measures of fast food retailers convey perceived fast food opportunities? Implications for food environment assessment

AU - Barnes, Timothy L.

AU - Colabianchi, Natalie

AU - Freedman, Darcy A.

AU - Bell, Bethany A.

AU - Liese, Angela D.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Purpose Geographic information systems (GISs) have been used to define fast food availability, with higher availability perhaps promoting poorer quality diets. Alternative measures involve perceptions; however, few studies have examined associations between GIS-derived and perceived measures of the food environment. Methods Telephone surveys of 705 participants within an eight-county region in South Carolina were analyzed using logistic regression to examine relationships between geographic presence of and distance to various types of food retailers and perceived fast food availability. Results The mean distance to the nearest fast food restaurant was 6.1 miles, with 16% of participants having a fast food restaurant within 1 mile of home. The geographic presence of and distance to all food retailer types were significantly associated with perceived availability of fast food in unadjusted models. After adjustment, only the presence of a fast food restaurant or pharmacy was significantly associated with greater odds of higher perceived availability of fast food. Greater odds of lower perceived availability of fast food were observed with the presence of a dollar store and increasing distance to the nearest supermarket or pharmacy. Conclusions Measures of fast food availability, whether objective or perceived, may not be interchangeable. Researchers should carefully decide on the appropriate measurement tool—GIS-derived or perceived—in food environment studies.

AB - Purpose Geographic information systems (GISs) have been used to define fast food availability, with higher availability perhaps promoting poorer quality diets. Alternative measures involve perceptions; however, few studies have examined associations between GIS-derived and perceived measures of the food environment. Methods Telephone surveys of 705 participants within an eight-county region in South Carolina were analyzed using logistic regression to examine relationships between geographic presence of and distance to various types of food retailers and perceived fast food availability. Results The mean distance to the nearest fast food restaurant was 6.1 miles, with 16% of participants having a fast food restaurant within 1 mile of home. The geographic presence of and distance to all food retailer types were significantly associated with perceived availability of fast food in unadjusted models. After adjustment, only the presence of a fast food restaurant or pharmacy was significantly associated with greater odds of higher perceived availability of fast food. Greater odds of lower perceived availability of fast food were observed with the presence of a dollar store and increasing distance to the nearest supermarket or pharmacy. Conclusions Measures of fast food availability, whether objective or perceived, may not be interchangeable. Researchers should carefully decide on the appropriate measurement tool—GIS-derived or perceived—in food environment studies.

KW - Fast food

KW - Food retailers

KW - Geographic

KW - GIS

KW - Perception

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994810760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994810760&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 27

EP - 34

JO - Annals of Epidemiology

JF - Annals of Epidemiology

SN - 1047-2797

IS - 1

ER -