Do Credit-Based Insurance Scores Proxy for Income in Predicting Auto Claim Risk?

Darcy Steeg Morris, Daniel Schwarcz, Joshua C. Teitelbaum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


Property and casualty insurers often use credit-based insurance scores in their underwriting and rating processes. The practice is controversial—many consumer groups oppose it, and most states regulate it, in part out of concern that insurance scores proxy for policyholder income in predicting claim risk. We offer new evidence on this issue in the context of auto insurance. Prior studies on the subject suffer from the limitation that they rely solely on aggregate measures of income, such as the median income in a policyholder's census tract or zip code. We analyze a panel of households that purchased auto and home policies from a U.S. insurance company. Because we observe the households’ home policies as well as their auto policies, we are able to employ two measures of income: the median income in a household's census tract, an aggregate measure, and the insured value of the household's dwelling, a policyholder-level measure. Using these measures, we find that insurance scores do not proxy for income in a standard actuarial model of auto claim risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)397-423
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Empirical Legal Studies
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jun 2017

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Cornell Law School and Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Dive into the research topics of 'Do Credit-Based Insurance Scores Proxy for Income in Predicting Auto Claim Risk?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this